Doesn't it seem that the rapist Pakistani I.e. "muslim", groups are the ' in democracy ' version if ISIS? That is, a cia created group designed to rupture cohesion and cultural agreement within Western democracies, at the service of advancing the a-cultural wasteland of globalism?
I think it is important that the men involved in the grooming gangs are Pakistani. Consider how you would feel if white men in Texas were exploiting Hispanic children---or members of the KKK were exploiting black children. The fact that there is an element of racial and religious animus motivating the attacks suggests that the children are at greater risk. A pedophile who is simply seeking sexual gratification—while still a terrible and dangerous person—is less likely to harm a child than someone acting out a combination of sexual, racial, and religious hostility.
There are key things I disagree with in your prelude to the essay and I am keeping my ears open because you are helping me break my silo- a point I’d like to explore is you are dividing sex offenders from rural Pakistani groups from the urban, sophisticated groups - may or may not be right - probably both - I think you are suggesting sex offences are quietly permitted to keep the Pakistani vote but how would that work when likely the majority of the Pakistani group would not want children to be preyed upon? You acknowledge that Pakistani people are NOT, in general, sex offenders. The other point is that the British media I see, does not apologise or support for the killer of the young girls in the recent atrocity. You are walking such a precious line and can very easily perpetuate more division with comments like this. I really appreciate your work, it is uncomfortable reading/listening and I think you like challenge, so I am writing to this end. Best wishes
BTW, I hope you have a chance to enjoy the sites, I've only been to the reykjavik airport, but I spent a summer 1 hr north of Helsinki, Finland. A beautiful, raw, all encompassing land… But hearty, genuine and earthy people… I can see how the globalists in their slick manner, with evil intentions, could make headway easily.
Naomi, I've been a joyful supporter of all your work, always will be, I'll work more diligently Going forward to promote your work, especially to women. your poetic and loving formula, is a perfect fit for many Democrats from days of your. The rhetoric today is abrasive on both sides, everyone's angry and it's too much for many. Thank you for being the sound, testing, knowledgeable and warm journalist that you are! I learned so much from you, thank you is too small, but that's what we have.🙏🥰
Posted this link on X and was promptly locked out. (The next time I tried to access it). Prompted to create a new password but it wouldn't let me. Strange...
I remember learning about the three foundational theories or philosophies that underpin policy, politics, and national security while attending the AWC - Liberalism, Realism, and Constructivism. We focused mainly on National Security strategy and how each of the three philosophies inform and shape respective NSSs. It was easy and interesting to compare liberalism and realism because at the time, President Trump (45) had recently released the 2017 NSS where it stated directly that "It is a strategy of principled realism that is guided by outcomes, not ideology." The previous NSS was founded on liberal principle's - alliances, institutions, and coalitions. Comparing them was an easy day. I had a problem conceiving of an NSS based on constructivist principles. It made no sense - belief or lack thereof is basis for a constructivist philosophy, policy, or strategy. Something doesn't exist if we can convince people that it doesn't regardless of reality. Things like Sovereignty, the Constitution, history, and a host of other concepts (gender, acceptable social practices etc.... ) are fare game. How or why would a country base an NSS on constructivists principles? The last 5+ years has opened my eyes.
I believe what we are seeing today, globally, is the execution of a constructivist strategy perpetrated against the collective West by a combination of state and non-state entities with the aid of entrenched allies (or traitors depending on you perspective). This is a much more difficult problem than outright hostilities because you can't always clearly discern the enemy nor identify and attribute to a sole or collection of Sovereign powers. I do believe that despite the constructivist soft-power nature, the end result will always be violence; it just happens later in the conflict continuum than a kinetic action.
I like to compare the three philosophies to rock, paper, scissors. Realism is the rock, Liberalism is the paper, and Constructivism is the scissors. Western society is based on a combination of realism and liberalism principles, the more liberal, the more susceptible to scissors. I hope there is enough realism left in the west to smash the scissors. It appears Russia certainly identified and nailed it.
The status of the UK & Canada are the results of the Globalists working to weaken, paralyze and control their populations. These populations are sold out by politicians who were bribed by lobbies and industries.
Cheers Naomi , enjoy the vodka / thanks for the lowdown on Reykjavik sounds interesting . Yeh in Britain our so called justice system is broken . Also are you aware of Lucy Letby miscarriage of justice ? https://open.substack.com/pub/callystarforth/p/wheres-the-justice?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=emailof I have done a lot of articles on our corrupt courts
Doesn't it seem that the rapist Pakistani I.e. "muslim", groups are the ' in democracy ' version if ISIS? That is, a cia created group designed to rupture cohesion and cultural agreement within Western democracies, at the service of advancing the a-cultural wasteland of globalism?
Thankyou so much for your work.
I think it is important that the men involved in the grooming gangs are Pakistani. Consider how you would feel if white men in Texas were exploiting Hispanic children---or members of the KKK were exploiting black children. The fact that there is an element of racial and religious animus motivating the attacks suggests that the children are at greater risk. A pedophile who is simply seeking sexual gratification—while still a terrible and dangerous person—is less likely to harm a child than someone acting out a combination of sexual, racial, and religious hostility.
There are key things I disagree with in your prelude to the essay and I am keeping my ears open because you are helping me break my silo- a point I’d like to explore is you are dividing sex offenders from rural Pakistani groups from the urban, sophisticated groups - may or may not be right - probably both - I think you are suggesting sex offences are quietly permitted to keep the Pakistani vote but how would that work when likely the majority of the Pakistani group would not want children to be preyed upon? You acknowledge that Pakistani people are NOT, in general, sex offenders. The other point is that the British media I see, does not apologise or support for the killer of the young girls in the recent atrocity. You are walking such a precious line and can very easily perpetuate more division with comments like this. I really appreciate your work, it is uncomfortable reading/listening and I think you like challenge, so I am writing to this end. Best wishes
Devastating, and important, essay, Dr Wolf. Thank you for your courage in always facing the Monsters.
BTW, I hope you have a chance to enjoy the sites, I've only been to the reykjavik airport, but I spent a summer 1 hr north of Helsinki, Finland. A beautiful, raw, all encompassing land… But hearty, genuine and earthy people… I can see how the globalists in their slick manner, with evil intentions, could make headway easily.
Naomi, I've been a joyful supporter of all your work, always will be, I'll work more diligently Going forward to promote your work, especially to women. your poetic and loving formula, is a perfect fit for many Democrats from days of your. The rhetoric today is abrasive on both sides, everyone's angry and it's too much for many. Thank you for being the sound, testing, knowledgeable and warm journalist that you are! I learned so much from you, thank you is too small, but that's what we have.🙏🥰
Posted this link on X and was promptly locked out. (The next time I tried to access it). Prompted to create a new password but it wouldn't let me. Strange...
I remember learning about the three foundational theories or philosophies that underpin policy, politics, and national security while attending the AWC - Liberalism, Realism, and Constructivism. We focused mainly on National Security strategy and how each of the three philosophies inform and shape respective NSSs. It was easy and interesting to compare liberalism and realism because at the time, President Trump (45) had recently released the 2017 NSS where it stated directly that "It is a strategy of principled realism that is guided by outcomes, not ideology." The previous NSS was founded on liberal principle's - alliances, institutions, and coalitions. Comparing them was an easy day. I had a problem conceiving of an NSS based on constructivist principles. It made no sense - belief or lack thereof is basis for a constructivist philosophy, policy, or strategy. Something doesn't exist if we can convince people that it doesn't regardless of reality. Things like Sovereignty, the Constitution, history, and a host of other concepts (gender, acceptable social practices etc.... ) are fare game. How or why would a country base an NSS on constructivists principles? The last 5+ years has opened my eyes.
I believe what we are seeing today, globally, is the execution of a constructivist strategy perpetrated against the collective West by a combination of state and non-state entities with the aid of entrenched allies (or traitors depending on you perspective). This is a much more difficult problem than outright hostilities because you can't always clearly discern the enemy nor identify and attribute to a sole or collection of Sovereign powers. I do believe that despite the constructivist soft-power nature, the end result will always be violence; it just happens later in the conflict continuum than a kinetic action.
I like to compare the three philosophies to rock, paper, scissors. Realism is the rock, Liberalism is the paper, and Constructivism is the scissors. Western society is based on a combination of realism and liberalism principles, the more liberal, the more susceptible to scissors. I hope there is enough realism left in the west to smash the scissors. It appears Russia certainly identified and nailed it.
🎤 The Return of the Prophet
by Ronald Copeland
[pause]
A little bit of fire goes a long way.
And I didn’t come here to warm your hands.
I came to speak what still burns.
I am not conformed.
Not to genre.
Not to structure.
Not to the neat lines of MFA programs and literary gatekeepers.
My writing doesn’t follow the rules
because the truth doesn’t always follow rules.
I come with fragmented thoughts.
Shards of vision.
Lines dropped in dreams.
Phrases I caught like rain while walking down forgotten roads.
You want a plot?
I give you a headline.
You want structure?
I give you a scream wrapped in scripture.
The voice I carry is not smooth.
It’s scorched.
It has tremor.
It has rhythm only the exiled can hear.
This is not performance.
This is return.
Return of the Prophet —
not a title, not a preacher, not a character in a book.
A presence.
I’ve come back to say:
You don’t have to be perfect to speak.
You don’t have to be healed to lead.
You don’t have to be approved to matter.
What makes my voice?
A picture of a house buried in ash
A news story about a mother left behind
A memory from Gucha
A poem scribbled in a waiting room
A hymn you can’t sing but still believe in
This world wants polish.
But I’ve brought ash and ember.
I’ve brought the sacred dust.
And here in this corner —
this pizza shop, this temporary sanctuary —
I offer a word from the fire:
You’re not lost.
You’re not late.
You’re just returning.
Welcome back.
The status of the UK & Canada are the results of the Globalists working to weaken, paralyze and control their populations. These populations are sold out by politicians who were bribed by lobbies and industries.
The populations sold out cheap, they own their fate.
Isn’t Tommy Robinson in prison in the UK for the same reasons?
robinson is a servant of the jews probably by now a mossad agent. Naomi got some mane of hair lol