Name Naomi, I’m looking for a doctor to send my brother to that has cancer throughout his body to use Ivermectin, Do you know any doctors besides Dr. Makis who is not taking any more patience at this time?
Cancer is caused by microparasites inside of cells along with a low body frequency. When these parasites break out of cells to invade more cells the sticky mess left behind becomes a tumor. Scientists discovered these microparasites in 1972 and Big Pharma covered it up. What kills these parasites? High frequencies from plants. In 2 minutes, I told you what causes cancer and what can reverse or prevent it. We have been fooled long enough. Check out my posts on Substack or my videos about cancer on Rumble under KimPaddock.
this page is from user "clo2xuewuliu" (Xuewu Liu) pushes a highly dangerous form of medical disinformation: the claim that injecting industrial bleach directly into tumors can cure cancer. [1, 2]
The author promotes "Intratumoral Chlorine Dioxide (ClO₂) Therapy" and uses misleading interpretations of medical imaging, like ultrasound, to trick desperate patients into believing they are watching a tumor melt away in real time. [1, 2]
The scientific and medical consensus proves these claims false for several critical reasons:
## 1. Chlorine Dioxide is Industrial Bleach, Not Medicine
The core ingredient being promoted, chlorine dioxide (ClO₂), is a powerful chemical bleach used for stripping textiles, treating wood pulp, and disinfecting industrial water. It is not an approved medical drug or device. Major regulatory agencies, including the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), have issued severe warnings against using chlorine dioxide internally, as it can cause liver failure, destruction of red blood cells, severe vomiting, and life-threatening drops in blood pressure. [3, 4]
## 2. Misleading "Tumor Shrinkage" on Ultrasound
The post claims that tumors visibly shrink on an ultrasound during this "therapy," even if the shrinkage doesn't show up on standard CT scans, MRI scans, or to the naked eye. This is a complete manipulation of how medical imaging works. [2]
* When chemical bleach is injected directly into a mass, it causes immediate tissue death (necrosis) and chemical burns.
* This localized destruction creates pockets of fluid, swelling, and gas bubbles.
* On an ultrasound, fluid and gas drastically alter how sound waves bounce back, which can artificially make the borders of a tumor look smaller or blurred.
* This is not a "cure"—it is simply chemical trauma destroying localized tissue while leaving the underlying cancer entirely free to spread throughout the body.
## 3. Exploiting the Declaration of Helsinki
The author misuses Article 37 of the Declaration of Helsinki—an international ethical guideline for physicians—to argue that doctors have a legal right to inject unapproved substances into patients who have run out of options. In reality, the Declaration of Helsinki is meant to guide compassionate, regulated, and scientifically sound medical trials by actual physicians. It was never written to protect or justify individuals selling dangerous industrial oxidants to vulnerable cancer patients online. [4, 5]
## 4. Severe Financial and Health Interventions
Like many alternative medical blogs, the ultimate goal of these posts is to steer patients away from standard, proven oncological care (like surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation) and push them toward unapproved protocols. Tragically, delaying real cancer treatment to try unproven direct-injection bleach therapies drastically reduces a patient's window of opportunity for actual survival. [1, 6]
------------------------------
Medical Disclaimer: Cancer treatment requires specialized, evidence-based care from licensed oncologists. Never delay standard medical treatments or inject unverified substances based on alternative health claims found on online blogs.
This page contains significant medical misinformation and is essentially an advertisement designed to sell pills. Independent scientists, fact-checkers, and cancer researchers have thoroughly debunked the claims made in this post. [1, 2, 3, 4]
The "study" being cited does not prove that ivermectin or mebendazole treats cancer. Instead, it uses flawed math and highly biased methods to trick readers into buying expensive alternative health products. [1, 3]
## Why the Claims in the Post are False
Medical experts and health researchers have pointed out several major reasons why this report is completely unreliable:
* No Control Group: The study did not compare patients taking ivermectin to patients who were not taking it. Many of the patients in the study were actively receiving standard, proven medical care like chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery at the same time. The study took credit for their health improvements, ignoring the fact that their actual cancer treatments were what was helping them. [4, 5, 6]
* Unverified, Self-Reported Surveys: The researchers did not look at medical records, X-rays, or actual doctor reports. Instead, they relied on self-reported online surveys. If a patient filled out a survey saying they felt "better," the authors counted that as a successful cancer treatment. [3, 4]
* Massive Conflicts of Interest: The study was authored by individuals tied to The Wellness Company, an organization that directly profits by selling the exact high-dose ivermectin and mebendazole pills advertised at the bottom of the article. [1]
* Scientific Pushback: Major health organizations have confirmed that there is absolutely zero reliable clinical evidence showing that antiparasitic drugs cure or treat cancer in humans. Shortly after the paper was published, the scientific journal issued an official "Expression of Concern" because other scientists raised serious alarms about how the data was handled. [4, 7, 8, 9]
## The Danger of This Misinformation
Oncologists (cancer doctors) warn that taking unproven drugs like ivermectin can be highly dangerous for cancer patients. It can cause severe liver damage and interact badly with real chemotherapy treatments, making them less effective. Tragically, some patients delay or completely abandon proven medical care because they are misled by online advertisements disguised as "breakthrough scientific studies". [1, 10, 11]
If you are researching options for yourself or a loved one, what specific questions or types of cancer treatments are you looking to understand better?
Oncologists (cancer doctors) warn that taking unproven drugs like ivermectin can be highly dangerous for cancer patients. It can cause severe liver damage and interact badly with real chemotherapy treatments, making them less effective.
Lots of TV ads for cancer. Eczema, IBS, arthritis and the list goes on.
Basically, after all the funding, promotions etc., what has worked ? Can we maybe look for causes rather than symptoms? Just curious.
how very bad such DIY revelations are for the drug companies. every low cost solution the people innovate takes away from patenting the next proprietary one....
This page contains significant medical misinformation and is essentially an advertisement designed to sell pills. Independent scientists, fact-checkers, and cancer researchers have thoroughly debunked the claims made in this post. [1, 2, 3, 4]
The "study" being cited does not prove that ivermectin or mebendazole treats cancer. Instead, it uses flawed math and highly biased methods to trick readers into buying expensive alternative health products. [1, 3]
## Why the Claims in the Post are False
Medical experts and health researchers have pointed out several major reasons why this report is completely unreliable:
* No Control Group: The study did not compare patients taking ivermectin to patients who were not taking it. Many of the patients in the study were actively receiving standard, proven medical care like chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery at the same time. The study took credit for their health improvements, ignoring the fact that their actual cancer treatments were what was helping them. [4, 5, 6]
* Unverified, Self-Reported Surveys: The researchers did not look at medical records, X-rays, or actual doctor reports. Instead, they relied on self-reported online surveys. If a patient filled out a survey saying they felt "better," the authors counted that as a successful cancer treatment. [3, 4]
* Massive Conflicts of Interest: The study was authored by individuals tied to The Wellness Company, an organization that directly profits by selling the exact high-dose ivermectin and mebendazole pills advertised at the bottom of the article. [1]
* Scientific Pushback: Major health organizations have confirmed that there is absolutely zero reliable clinical evidence showing that antiparasitic drugs cure or treat cancer in humans. Shortly after the paper was published, the scientific journal issued an official "Expression of Concern" because other scientists raised serious alarms about how the data was handled. [4, 7, 8, 9]
## The Danger of This Misinformation
Oncologists (cancer doctors) warn that taking unproven drugs like ivermectin can be highly dangerous for cancer patients. It can cause severe liver damage and interact badly with real chemotherapy treatments, making them less effective. Tragically, some patients delay or completely abandon proven medical care because they are misled by online advertisements disguised as "breakthrough scientific studies". [1, 10, 11]
If you are researching options for yourself or a loved one, what specific questions or types of cancer treatments are you looking to understand better?
This is exactly why the word “foundation” has to be inspected carefully.
There are real foundations and health organizations doing work across Africa, Asia, Latin America, and other regions. They fund research, public health, agriculture, food systems, medicine access, and infrastructure.
So if this ivermectin + mebendazole cancer claim is truly a global breakthrough, then where is the global evidence?
Where are the independent trials in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East?
Where are the comparisons with countries that have different cancer systems, different diets, different treatment access, different poverty levels, and different survival outcomes?
Where are the control groups?
Where are the verified scans?
Where is the independent oncology review?
Where is the full conflict-of-interest wall between the people promoting the study and the people selling the product?
Instead, what do we see?
A “breakthrough” headline.
A wellness company.
A product pathway.
A checkout page.
A prescription request.
Testimonials.
A discount code.
That is not clean humanitarian science.
That is marketing using research language.
If the medicine has value, study it properly. Study it globally. Study it independently. Study it before selling hope to cancer patients.
Cancer patients do not need a sales funnel dressed as mercy.
this page is from user "clo2xuewuliu" (Xuewu Liu) pushes a highly dangerous form of medical disinformation: the claim that injecting industrial bleach directly into tumors can cure cancer. [1, 2]
The author promotes "Intratumoral Chlorine Dioxide (ClO₂) Therapy" and uses misleading interpretations of medical imaging, like ultrasound, to trick desperate patients into believing they are watching a tumor melt away in real time. [1, 2]
The scientific and medical consensus proves these claims false for several critical reasons:
## 1. Chlorine Dioxide is Industrial Bleach, Not Medicine
The core ingredient being promoted, chlorine dioxide (ClO₂), is a powerful chemical bleach used for stripping textiles, treating wood pulp, and disinfecting industrial water. It is not an approved medical drug or device. Major regulatory agencies, including the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), have issued severe warnings against using chlorine dioxide internally, as it can cause liver failure, destruction of red blood cells, severe vomiting, and life-threatening drops in blood pressure. [3, 4]
## 2. Misleading "Tumor Shrinkage" on Ultrasound
The post claims that tumors visibly shrink on an ultrasound during this "therapy," even if the shrinkage doesn't show up on standard CT scans, MRI scans, or to the naked eye. This is a complete manipulation of how medical imaging works. [2]
* When chemical bleach is injected directly into a mass, it causes immediate tissue death (necrosis) and chemical burns.
* This localized destruction creates pockets of fluid, swelling, and gas bubbles.
* On an ultrasound, fluid and gas drastically alter how sound waves bounce back, which can artificially make the borders of a tumor look smaller or blurred.
* This is not a "cure"—it is simply chemical trauma destroying localized tissue while leaving the underlying cancer entirely free to spread throughout the body.
## 3. Exploiting the Declaration of Helsinki
The author misuses Article 37 of the Declaration of Helsinki—an international ethical guideline for physicians—to argue that doctors have a legal right to inject unapproved substances into patients who have run out of options. In reality, the Declaration of Helsinki is meant to guide compassionate, regulated, and scientifically sound medical trials by actual physicians. It was never written to protect or justify individuals selling dangerous industrial oxidants to vulnerable cancer patients online. [4, 5]
## 4. Severe Financial and Health Interventions
Like many alternative medical blogs, the ultimate goal of these posts is to steer patients away from standard, proven oncological care (like surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation) and push them toward unapproved protocols. Tragically, delaying real cancer treatment to try unproven direct-injection bleach therapies drastically reduces a patient's window of opportunity for actual survival. [1, 6]
------------------------------
Medical Disclaimer: Cancer treatment requires specialized, evidence-based care from licensed oncologists. Never delay standard medical treatments or inject unverified substances based on alternative health claims found on online blogs.
Outlawed, thank you for this thorough and medically accurate breakdown of the ClO2 scam—your ultrasound explanation is particularly sharp, and I agree completely that this bleach therapy is predatory and dangerous.
However, I think we are talking past each other. My original post was specifically about the Ivermectin + Mebendazole protocol, not chlorine dioxide. Those are repurposed drugs, not industrial bleach. While I am deeply skeptical of that protocol too (hence my questions about global trials and control groups), I want to be clear that I am not defending Xuewu Liu or bleach injections.
Since you clearly have a strong grasp of research methodology, I’d love your actual take on my original question: Do you know of any independent, globally-run trials for the Ivermectin/Mebendazole combo in Africa or Asia? Or do you agree that the lack of those trials makes the 'checkout page' model just as unethical, even if the chemical itself isn't bleach?
The Wellness Company has a lot of bad customer reviews which make me skeptical of anything they may claim since it appears they prioritize product sales over order fulfillment. This whole article comes off as a marketing attempt and I wonder if they had to pay a fee to blast this out to everyone on this email list.
After the Covid scamdemic, my trust in believing anything a company or government claims has been shattered.
this page is from user "clo2xuewuliu" (Xuewu Liu) pushes a highly dangerous form of medical disinformation: the claim that injecting industrial bleach directly into tumors can cure cancer. [1, 2]
The author promotes "Intratumoral Chlorine Dioxide (ClO₂) Therapy" and uses misleading interpretations of medical imaging, like ultrasound, to trick desperate patients into believing they are watching a tumor melt away in real time. [1, 2]
The scientific and medical consensus proves these claims false for several critical reasons:
## 1. Chlorine Dioxide is Industrial Bleach, Not Medicine
The core ingredient being promoted, chlorine dioxide (ClO₂), is a powerful chemical bleach used for stripping textiles, treating wood pulp, and disinfecting industrial water. It is not an approved medical drug or device. Major regulatory agencies, including the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), have issued severe warnings against using chlorine dioxide internally, as it can cause liver failure, destruction of red blood cells, severe vomiting, and life-threatening drops in blood pressure. [3, 4]
## 2. Misleading "Tumor Shrinkage" on Ultrasound
The post claims that tumors visibly shrink on an ultrasound during this "therapy," even if the shrinkage doesn't show up on standard CT scans, MRI scans, or to the naked eye. This is a complete manipulation of how medical imaging works. [2]
* When chemical bleach is injected directly into a mass, it causes immediate tissue death (necrosis) and chemical burns.
* This localized destruction creates pockets of fluid, swelling, and gas bubbles.
* On an ultrasound, fluid and gas drastically alter how sound waves bounce back, which can artificially make the borders of a tumor look smaller or blurred.
* This is not a "cure"—it is simply chemical trauma destroying localized tissue while leaving the underlying cancer entirely free to spread throughout the body.
## 3. Exploiting the Declaration of Helsinki
The author misuses Article 37 of the Declaration of Helsinki—an international ethical guideline for physicians—to argue that doctors have a legal right to inject unapproved substances into patients who have run out of options. In reality, the Declaration of Helsinki is meant to guide compassionate, regulated, and scientifically sound medical trials by actual physicians. It was never written to protect or justify individuals selling dangerous industrial oxidants to vulnerable cancer patients online. [4, 5]
## 4. Severe Financial and Health Interventions
Like many alternative medical blogs, the ultimate goal of these posts is to steer patients away from standard, proven oncological care (like surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation) and push them toward unapproved protocols. Tragically, delaying real cancer treatment to try unproven direct-injection bleach therapies drastically reduces a patient's window of opportunity for actual survival. [1, 6]
------------------------------
Medical Disclaimer: Cancer treatment requires specialized, evidence-based care from licensed oncologists. Never delay standard medical treatments or inject unverified substances based on alternative health claims found on online blogs.
This page contains significant medical misinformation and is essentially an advertisement designed to sell pills. Independent scientists, fact-checkers, and cancer researchers have thoroughly debunked the claims made in this post. [1, 2, 3, 4]
The "study" being cited does not prove that ivermectin or mebendazole treats cancer. Instead, it uses flawed math and highly biased methods to trick readers into buying expensive alternative health products. [1, 3]
## Why the Claims in the Post are False
Medical experts and health researchers have pointed out several major reasons why this report is completely unreliable:
* No Control Group: The study did not compare patients taking ivermectin to patients who were not taking it. Many of the patients in the study were actively receiving standard, proven medical care like chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery at the same time. The study took credit for their health improvements, ignoring the fact that their actual cancer treatments were what was helping them. [4, 5, 6]
* Unverified, Self-Reported Surveys: The researchers did not look at medical records, X-rays, or actual doctor reports. Instead, they relied on self-reported online surveys. If a patient filled out a survey saying they felt "better," the authors counted that as a successful cancer treatment. [3, 4]
* Massive Conflicts of Interest: The study was authored by individuals tied to The Wellness Company, an organization that directly profits by selling the exact high-dose ivermectin and mebendazole pills advertised at the bottom of the article. [1]
* Scientific Pushback: Major health organizations have confirmed that there is absolutely zero reliable clinical evidence showing that antiparasitic drugs cure or treat cancer in humans. Shortly after the paper was published, the scientific journal issued an official "Expression of Concern" because other scientists raised serious alarms about how the data was handled. [4, 7, 8, 9]
## The Danger of This Misinformation
Oncologists (cancer doctors) warn that taking unproven drugs like ivermectin can be highly dangerous for cancer patients. It can cause severe liver damage and interact badly with real chemotherapy treatments, making them less effective. Tragically, some patients delay or completely abandon proven medical care because they are misled by online advertisements disguised as "breakthrough scientific studies". [1, 10, 11]
If you are researching options for yourself or a loved one, what specific questions or types of cancer treatments are you looking to understand better?
I don't trust a criminal company like Merck who is the maker of Ivermectin. Trusting one criminal organization over another isn't a wise move in my opinion. There are many articles on Ivermectin. Here are a few- https://www.bitchute.com/video/bCXPbATdSqUN
This page contains significant medical misinformation and is essentially an advertisement designed to sell pills. Independent scientists, fact-checkers, and cancer researchers have thoroughly debunked the claims made in this post. [1, 2, 3, 4]
The "study" being cited does not prove that ivermectin or mebendazole treats cancer. Instead, it uses flawed math and highly biased methods to trick readers into buying expensive alternative health products. [1, 3]
## Why the Claims in the Post are False
Medical experts and health researchers have pointed out several major reasons why this report is completely unreliable:
* No Control Group: The study did not compare patients taking ivermectin to patients who were not taking it. Many of the patients in the study were actively receiving standard, proven medical care like chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery at the same time. The study took credit for their health improvements, ignoring the fact that their actual cancer treatments were what was helping them. [4, 5, 6]
* Unverified, Self-Reported Surveys: The researchers did not look at medical records, X-rays, or actual doctor reports. Instead, they relied on self-reported online surveys. If a patient filled out a survey saying they felt "better," the authors counted that as a successful cancer treatment. [3, 4]
* Massive Conflicts of Interest: The study was authored by individuals tied to The Wellness Company, an organization that directly profits by selling the exact high-dose ivermectin and mebendazole pills advertised at the bottom of the article. [1]
* Scientific Pushback: Major health organizations have confirmed that there is absolutely zero reliable clinical evidence showing that antiparasitic drugs cure or treat cancer in humans. Shortly after the paper was published, the scientific journal issued an official "Expression of Concern" because other scientists raised serious alarms about how the data was handled. [4, 7, 8, 9]
## The Danger of This Misinformation
Oncologists (cancer doctors) warn that taking unproven drugs like ivermectin can be highly dangerous for cancer patients. It can cause severe liver damage and interact badly with real chemotherapy treatments, making them less effective. Tragically, some patients delay or completely abandon proven medical care because they are misled by online advertisements disguised as "breakthrough scientific studies". [1, 10, 11]
If you are researching options for yourself or a loved one, what specific questions or types of cancer treatments are you looking to understand better?
Many good statements here. Ivermectin and related types of medications have never been proven to cure cancer or relieve symptoms, But Chemo is an absolute disaster as well. Its failure rate is enormous. My own experience is that my mother, my brother and my stepfather were all murdered through Chemo. Along with the fact that my mother was Severely burned in her lungs with radiation. These have proven to be terrible treatments. And with the billions used to find supposed treatments for cancer, Cancer cases continue to increase. These protocol are not the answer, but they do make billions for criminal Big Pharma, so they won’t go away.
This page contains significant medical misinformation and is essentially an advertisement designed to sell pills. Independent scientists, fact-checkers, and cancer researchers have thoroughly debunked the claims made in this post. [1, 2, 3, 4]
The "study" being cited does not prove that ivermectin or mebendazole treats cancer. Instead, it uses flawed math and highly biased methods to trick readers into buying expensive alternative health products. [1, 3]
## Why the Claims in the Post are False
Medical experts and health researchers have pointed out several major reasons why this report is completely unreliable:
* No Control Group: The study did not compare patients taking ivermectin to patients who were not taking it. Many of the patients in the study were actively receiving standard, proven medical care like chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery at the same time. The study took credit for their health improvements, ignoring the fact that their actual cancer treatments were what was helping them. [4, 5, 6]
* Unverified, Self-Reported Surveys: The researchers did not look at medical records, X-rays, or actual doctor reports. Instead, they relied on self-reported online surveys. If a patient filled out a survey saying they felt "better," the authors counted that as a successful cancer treatment. [3, 4]
* Massive Conflicts of Interest: The study was authored by individuals tied to The Wellness Company, an organization that directly profits by selling the exact high-dose ivermectin and mebendazole pills advertised at the bottom of the article. [1]
* Scientific Pushback: Major health organizations have confirmed that there is absolutely zero reliable clinical evidence showing that antiparasitic drugs cure or treat cancer in humans. Shortly after the paper was published, the scientific journal issued an official "Expression of Concern" because other scientists raised serious alarms about how the data was handled. [4, 7, 8, 9]
## The Danger of This Misinformation
Oncologists (cancer doctors) warn that taking unproven drugs like ivermectin can be highly dangerous for cancer patients. It can cause severe liver damage and interact badly with real chemotherapy treatments, making them less effective. Tragically, some patients delay or completely abandon proven medical care because they are misled by online advertisements disguised as "breakthrough scientific studies". [1, 10, 11]
If you are researching options for yourself or a loved one, what specific questions or types of cancer treatments are you looking to understand better?
excerpt: "and the Physcian had to SEARCH for a nodule big enough to get a sample from, and the ONE that he found was at the bottom of her left lung that he said was only a few centimeters wide".
ONLY a few centimeters wide - you mean more than an inch?? did this person mean millimeters? (2.54 cm/inch)
The 4+4+9% does not seem to make much sense, missing digits perhaps, not a good look. Looked at the paper abstract and could not find it there immediately. Odd. The 84.4% was there though.
Name Naomi, I’m looking for a doctor to send my brother to that has cancer throughout his body to use Ivermectin, Do you know any doctors besides Dr. Makis who is not taking any more patience at this time?
I would, myself, accept Dr. McCullough's research and findings.
Cancer is caused by microparasites inside of cells along with a low body frequency. When these parasites break out of cells to invade more cells the sticky mess left behind becomes a tumor. Scientists discovered these microparasites in 1972 and Big Pharma covered it up. What kills these parasites? High frequencies from plants. In 2 minutes, I told you what causes cancer and what can reverse or prevent it. We have been fooled long enough. Check out my posts on Substack or my videos about cancer on Rumble under KimPaddock.
this page is from user "clo2xuewuliu" (Xuewu Liu) pushes a highly dangerous form of medical disinformation: the claim that injecting industrial bleach directly into tumors can cure cancer. [1, 2]
The author promotes "Intratumoral Chlorine Dioxide (ClO₂) Therapy" and uses misleading interpretations of medical imaging, like ultrasound, to trick desperate patients into believing they are watching a tumor melt away in real time. [1, 2]
The scientific and medical consensus proves these claims false for several critical reasons:
## 1. Chlorine Dioxide is Industrial Bleach, Not Medicine
The core ingredient being promoted, chlorine dioxide (ClO₂), is a powerful chemical bleach used for stripping textiles, treating wood pulp, and disinfecting industrial water. It is not an approved medical drug or device. Major regulatory agencies, including the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), have issued severe warnings against using chlorine dioxide internally, as it can cause liver failure, destruction of red blood cells, severe vomiting, and life-threatening drops in blood pressure. [3, 4]
## 2. Misleading "Tumor Shrinkage" on Ultrasound
The post claims that tumors visibly shrink on an ultrasound during this "therapy," even if the shrinkage doesn't show up on standard CT scans, MRI scans, or to the naked eye. This is a complete manipulation of how medical imaging works. [2]
* When chemical bleach is injected directly into a mass, it causes immediate tissue death (necrosis) and chemical burns.
* This localized destruction creates pockets of fluid, swelling, and gas bubbles.
* On an ultrasound, fluid and gas drastically alter how sound waves bounce back, which can artificially make the borders of a tumor look smaller or blurred.
* This is not a "cure"—it is simply chemical trauma destroying localized tissue while leaving the underlying cancer entirely free to spread throughout the body.
## 3. Exploiting the Declaration of Helsinki
The author misuses Article 37 of the Declaration of Helsinki—an international ethical guideline for physicians—to argue that doctors have a legal right to inject unapproved substances into patients who have run out of options. In reality, the Declaration of Helsinki is meant to guide compassionate, regulated, and scientifically sound medical trials by actual physicians. It was never written to protect or justify individuals selling dangerous industrial oxidants to vulnerable cancer patients online. [4, 5]
## 4. Severe Financial and Health Interventions
Like many alternative medical blogs, the ultimate goal of these posts is to steer patients away from standard, proven oncological care (like surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation) and push them toward unapproved protocols. Tragically, delaying real cancer treatment to try unproven direct-injection bleach therapies drastically reduces a patient's window of opportunity for actual survival. [1, 6]
------------------------------
Medical Disclaimer: Cancer treatment requires specialized, evidence-based care from licensed oncologists. Never delay standard medical treatments or inject unverified substances based on alternative health claims found on online blogs.
Quick questions if you have time:
* Was this explanation simple to understand?
* What would you like to check next?
[1] [https://www.linkedin.com](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/xuewu-liu_intratumoral-chlorine-dioxide-therapy-timing-activity-7320686684474417152-fZ6H)
[2] [https://www.linkedin.com](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/xuewu-liu_why-tumors-shrink-on-ultrasound-but-not-on-activity-7374385914661457920-Tis0)
[3] [https://www.linkedin.com](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/xuewu-liu_major-update-chlorine-dioxide-is-a-medical-activity-7389185201068998656-GtC9)
[4] [https://www.linkedin.com](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/xuewu-liu_title-the-three-core-mechanisms-of-chlorine-activity-7320457413210357762-c32t)
[5] [https://www.linkedin.com](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/xuewu-liu_three-legal-pathways-for-bringing-the-intratumoral-activity-7361287577452068866-4t5k)
[6] [https://pioneerworksbroadcast.substack.com](https://pioneerworksbroadcast.substack.com/p/the-horrors-of-ultrasound-technology)
This page contains significant medical misinformation and is essentially an advertisement designed to sell pills. Independent scientists, fact-checkers, and cancer researchers have thoroughly debunked the claims made in this post. [1, 2, 3, 4]
The "study" being cited does not prove that ivermectin or mebendazole treats cancer. Instead, it uses flawed math and highly biased methods to trick readers into buying expensive alternative health products. [1, 3]
## Why the Claims in the Post are False
Medical experts and health researchers have pointed out several major reasons why this report is completely unreliable:
* No Control Group: The study did not compare patients taking ivermectin to patients who were not taking it. Many of the patients in the study were actively receiving standard, proven medical care like chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery at the same time. The study took credit for their health improvements, ignoring the fact that their actual cancer treatments were what was helping them. [4, 5, 6]
* Unverified, Self-Reported Surveys: The researchers did not look at medical records, X-rays, or actual doctor reports. Instead, they relied on self-reported online surveys. If a patient filled out a survey saying they felt "better," the authors counted that as a successful cancer treatment. [3, 4]
* Massive Conflicts of Interest: The study was authored by individuals tied to The Wellness Company, an organization that directly profits by selling the exact high-dose ivermectin and mebendazole pills advertised at the bottom of the article. [1]
* Scientific Pushback: Major health organizations have confirmed that there is absolutely zero reliable clinical evidence showing that antiparasitic drugs cure or treat cancer in humans. Shortly after the paper was published, the scientific journal issued an official "Expression of Concern" because other scientists raised serious alarms about how the data was handled. [4, 7, 8, 9]
## The Danger of This Misinformation
Oncologists (cancer doctors) warn that taking unproven drugs like ivermectin can be highly dangerous for cancer patients. It can cause severe liver damage and interact badly with real chemotherapy treatments, making them less effective. Tragically, some patients delay or completely abandon proven medical care because they are misled by online advertisements disguised as "breakthrough scientific studies". [1, 10, 11]
If you are researching options for yourself or a loved one, what specific questions or types of cancer treatments are you looking to understand better?
[1] [https://www.newsfromthestates.com](https://www.newsfromthestates.com/article/ivermectin-isnt-cancer-miracle-drug-influencers-claim-otherwise-good-science-takes-time)
[2] [https://www.yahoo.com](https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/fact-check-preprint-claiming-84-030817813.html)
[3] [https://www.yahoo.com](https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/fact-check-preprint-claiming-84-030817813.html)
[4] [https://health.yahoo.com](https://health.yahoo.com/conditions/cancer/articles/ivermectin-isn-t-cancer-miracle-183846485.html)
[5] [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42203321/)
[6] [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42203321/)
[7] [https://apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-ivermectin-nih-cancer-cure-629592291079)
[8] [https://patient.info](https://patient.info/features/cancer/ivermectin-explained)
[9] [https://www.instagram.com](https://www.instagram.com/p/DYR6dXGDiX1/)
[10] [https://binaytara.org](https://binaytara.org/cancernews/article/what-cancer-doctors-are-saying-about-ivermectin-and-cancer-treatment)
[11] [https://www.youtube.com](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHcZ6TRR9xE&t=5)
Oncologists (cancer doctors) warn that taking unproven drugs like ivermectin can be highly dangerous for cancer patients. It can cause severe liver damage and interact badly with real chemotherapy treatments, making them less effective.
Lots of TV ads for cancer. Eczema, IBS, arthritis and the list goes on.
Basically, after all the funding, promotions etc., what has worked ? Can we maybe look for causes rather than symptoms? Just curious.
how very bad such DIY revelations are for the drug companies. every low cost solution the people innovate takes away from patenting the next proprietary one....
This page contains significant medical misinformation and is essentially an advertisement designed to sell pills. Independent scientists, fact-checkers, and cancer researchers have thoroughly debunked the claims made in this post. [1, 2, 3, 4]
The "study" being cited does not prove that ivermectin or mebendazole treats cancer. Instead, it uses flawed math and highly biased methods to trick readers into buying expensive alternative health products. [1, 3]
## Why the Claims in the Post are False
Medical experts and health researchers have pointed out several major reasons why this report is completely unreliable:
* No Control Group: The study did not compare patients taking ivermectin to patients who were not taking it. Many of the patients in the study were actively receiving standard, proven medical care like chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery at the same time. The study took credit for their health improvements, ignoring the fact that their actual cancer treatments were what was helping them. [4, 5, 6]
* Unverified, Self-Reported Surveys: The researchers did not look at medical records, X-rays, or actual doctor reports. Instead, they relied on self-reported online surveys. If a patient filled out a survey saying they felt "better," the authors counted that as a successful cancer treatment. [3, 4]
* Massive Conflicts of Interest: The study was authored by individuals tied to The Wellness Company, an organization that directly profits by selling the exact high-dose ivermectin and mebendazole pills advertised at the bottom of the article. [1]
* Scientific Pushback: Major health organizations have confirmed that there is absolutely zero reliable clinical evidence showing that antiparasitic drugs cure or treat cancer in humans. Shortly after the paper was published, the scientific journal issued an official "Expression of Concern" because other scientists raised serious alarms about how the data was handled. [4, 7, 8, 9]
## The Danger of This Misinformation
Oncologists (cancer doctors) warn that taking unproven drugs like ivermectin can be highly dangerous for cancer patients. It can cause severe liver damage and interact badly with real chemotherapy treatments, making them less effective. Tragically, some patients delay or completely abandon proven medical care because they are misled by online advertisements disguised as "breakthrough scientific studies". [1, 10, 11]
If you are researching options for yourself or a loved one, what specific questions or types of cancer treatments are you looking to understand better?
[1] [https://www.newsfromthestates.com](https://www.newsfromthestates.com/article/ivermectin-isnt-cancer-miracle-drug-influencers-claim-otherwise-good-science-takes-time)
[2] [https://www.yahoo.com](https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/fact-check-preprint-claiming-84-030817813.html)
[3] [https://www.yahoo.com](https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/fact-check-preprint-claiming-84-030817813.html)
[4] [https://health.yahoo.com](https://health.yahoo.com/conditions/cancer/articles/ivermectin-isn-t-cancer-miracle-183846485.html)
[5] [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42203321/)
[6] [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42203321/)
[7] [https://apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-ivermectin-nih-cancer-cure-629592291079)
[8] [https://patient.info](https://patient.info/features/cancer/ivermectin-explained)
[9] [https://www.instagram.com](https://www.instagram.com/p/DYR6dXGDiX1/)
[10] [https://binaytara.org](https://binaytara.org/cancernews/article/what-cancer-doctors-are-saying-about-ivermectin-and-cancer-treatment)
[11] [https://www.youtube.com](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHcZ6TRR9xE&t=5)
This is exactly why the word “foundation” has to be inspected carefully.
There are real foundations and health organizations doing work across Africa, Asia, Latin America, and other regions. They fund research, public health, agriculture, food systems, medicine access, and infrastructure.
So if this ivermectin + mebendazole cancer claim is truly a global breakthrough, then where is the global evidence?
Where are the independent trials in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East?
Where are the comparisons with countries that have different cancer systems, different diets, different treatment access, different poverty levels, and different survival outcomes?
Where are the control groups?
Where are the verified scans?
Where is the independent oncology review?
Where is the full conflict-of-interest wall between the people promoting the study and the people selling the product?
Instead, what do we see?
A “breakthrough” headline.
A wellness company.
A product pathway.
A checkout page.
A prescription request.
Testimonials.
A discount code.
That is not clean humanitarian science.
That is marketing using research language.
If the medicine has value, study it properly. Study it globally. Study it independently. Study it before selling hope to cancer patients.
Cancer patients do not need a sales funnel dressed as mercy.
They need truth before checkout.
this page is from user "clo2xuewuliu" (Xuewu Liu) pushes a highly dangerous form of medical disinformation: the claim that injecting industrial bleach directly into tumors can cure cancer. [1, 2]
The author promotes "Intratumoral Chlorine Dioxide (ClO₂) Therapy" and uses misleading interpretations of medical imaging, like ultrasound, to trick desperate patients into believing they are watching a tumor melt away in real time. [1, 2]
The scientific and medical consensus proves these claims false for several critical reasons:
## 1. Chlorine Dioxide is Industrial Bleach, Not Medicine
The core ingredient being promoted, chlorine dioxide (ClO₂), is a powerful chemical bleach used for stripping textiles, treating wood pulp, and disinfecting industrial water. It is not an approved medical drug or device. Major regulatory agencies, including the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), have issued severe warnings against using chlorine dioxide internally, as it can cause liver failure, destruction of red blood cells, severe vomiting, and life-threatening drops in blood pressure. [3, 4]
## 2. Misleading "Tumor Shrinkage" on Ultrasound
The post claims that tumors visibly shrink on an ultrasound during this "therapy," even if the shrinkage doesn't show up on standard CT scans, MRI scans, or to the naked eye. This is a complete manipulation of how medical imaging works. [2]
* When chemical bleach is injected directly into a mass, it causes immediate tissue death (necrosis) and chemical burns.
* This localized destruction creates pockets of fluid, swelling, and gas bubbles.
* On an ultrasound, fluid and gas drastically alter how sound waves bounce back, which can artificially make the borders of a tumor look smaller or blurred.
* This is not a "cure"—it is simply chemical trauma destroying localized tissue while leaving the underlying cancer entirely free to spread throughout the body.
## 3. Exploiting the Declaration of Helsinki
The author misuses Article 37 of the Declaration of Helsinki—an international ethical guideline for physicians—to argue that doctors have a legal right to inject unapproved substances into patients who have run out of options. In reality, the Declaration of Helsinki is meant to guide compassionate, regulated, and scientifically sound medical trials by actual physicians. It was never written to protect or justify individuals selling dangerous industrial oxidants to vulnerable cancer patients online. [4, 5]
## 4. Severe Financial and Health Interventions
Like many alternative medical blogs, the ultimate goal of these posts is to steer patients away from standard, proven oncological care (like surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation) and push them toward unapproved protocols. Tragically, delaying real cancer treatment to try unproven direct-injection bleach therapies drastically reduces a patient's window of opportunity for actual survival. [1, 6]
------------------------------
Medical Disclaimer: Cancer treatment requires specialized, evidence-based care from licensed oncologists. Never delay standard medical treatments or inject unverified substances based on alternative health claims found on online blogs.
Quick questions if you have time:
* Was this explanation simple to understand?
* What would you like to check next?
[1] [https://www.linkedin.com](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/xuewu-liu_intratumoral-chlorine-dioxide-therapy-timing-activity-7320686684474417152-fZ6H)
[2] [https://www.linkedin.com](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/xuewu-liu_why-tumors-shrink-on-ultrasound-but-not-on-activity-7374385914661457920-Tis0)
[3] [https://www.linkedin.com](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/xuewu-liu_major-update-chlorine-dioxide-is-a-medical-activity-7389185201068998656-GtC9)
[4] [https://www.linkedin.com](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/xuewu-liu_title-the-three-core-mechanisms-of-chlorine-activity-7320457413210357762-c32t)
[5] [https://www.linkedin.com](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/xuewu-liu_three-legal-pathways-for-bringing-the-intratumoral-activity-7361287577452068866-4t5k)
[6] [https://pioneerworksbroadcast.substack.com](https://pioneerworksbroadcast.substack.com/p/the-horrors-of-ultrasound-technology)
Outlawed, thank you for this thorough and medically accurate breakdown of the ClO2 scam—your ultrasound explanation is particularly sharp, and I agree completely that this bleach therapy is predatory and dangerous.
However, I think we are talking past each other. My original post was specifically about the Ivermectin + Mebendazole protocol, not chlorine dioxide. Those are repurposed drugs, not industrial bleach. While I am deeply skeptical of that protocol too (hence my questions about global trials and control groups), I want to be clear that I am not defending Xuewu Liu or bleach injections.
Since you clearly have a strong grasp of research methodology, I’d love your actual take on my original question: Do you know of any independent, globally-run trials for the Ivermectin/Mebendazole combo in Africa or Asia? Or do you agree that the lack of those trials makes the 'checkout page' model just as unethical, even if the chemical itself isn't bleach?
The Wellness Company has a lot of bad customer reviews which make me skeptical of anything they may claim since it appears they prioritize product sales over order fulfillment. This whole article comes off as a marketing attempt and I wonder if they had to pay a fee to blast this out to everyone on this email list.
After the Covid scamdemic, my trust in believing anything a company or government claims has been shattered.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32971268/
this page is from user "clo2xuewuliu" (Xuewu Liu) pushes a highly dangerous form of medical disinformation: the claim that injecting industrial bleach directly into tumors can cure cancer. [1, 2]
The author promotes "Intratumoral Chlorine Dioxide (ClO₂) Therapy" and uses misleading interpretations of medical imaging, like ultrasound, to trick desperate patients into believing they are watching a tumor melt away in real time. [1, 2]
The scientific and medical consensus proves these claims false for several critical reasons:
## 1. Chlorine Dioxide is Industrial Bleach, Not Medicine
The core ingredient being promoted, chlorine dioxide (ClO₂), is a powerful chemical bleach used for stripping textiles, treating wood pulp, and disinfecting industrial water. It is not an approved medical drug or device. Major regulatory agencies, including the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), have issued severe warnings against using chlorine dioxide internally, as it can cause liver failure, destruction of red blood cells, severe vomiting, and life-threatening drops in blood pressure. [3, 4]
## 2. Misleading "Tumor Shrinkage" on Ultrasound
The post claims that tumors visibly shrink on an ultrasound during this "therapy," even if the shrinkage doesn't show up on standard CT scans, MRI scans, or to the naked eye. This is a complete manipulation of how medical imaging works. [2]
* When chemical bleach is injected directly into a mass, it causes immediate tissue death (necrosis) and chemical burns.
* This localized destruction creates pockets of fluid, swelling, and gas bubbles.
* On an ultrasound, fluid and gas drastically alter how sound waves bounce back, which can artificially make the borders of a tumor look smaller or blurred.
* This is not a "cure"—it is simply chemical trauma destroying localized tissue while leaving the underlying cancer entirely free to spread throughout the body.
## 3. Exploiting the Declaration of Helsinki
The author misuses Article 37 of the Declaration of Helsinki—an international ethical guideline for physicians—to argue that doctors have a legal right to inject unapproved substances into patients who have run out of options. In reality, the Declaration of Helsinki is meant to guide compassionate, regulated, and scientifically sound medical trials by actual physicians. It was never written to protect or justify individuals selling dangerous industrial oxidants to vulnerable cancer patients online. [4, 5]
## 4. Severe Financial and Health Interventions
Like many alternative medical blogs, the ultimate goal of these posts is to steer patients away from standard, proven oncological care (like surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation) and push them toward unapproved protocols. Tragically, delaying real cancer treatment to try unproven direct-injection bleach therapies drastically reduces a patient's window of opportunity for actual survival. [1, 6]
------------------------------
Medical Disclaimer: Cancer treatment requires specialized, evidence-based care from licensed oncologists. Never delay standard medical treatments or inject unverified substances based on alternative health claims found on online blogs.
Quick questions if you have time:
* Was this explanation simple to understand?
* What would you like to check next?
[1] [https://www.linkedin.com](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/xuewu-liu_intratumoral-chlorine-dioxide-therapy-timing-activity-7320686684474417152-fZ6H)
[2] [https://www.linkedin.com](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/xuewu-liu_why-tumors-shrink-on-ultrasound-but-not-on-activity-7374385914661457920-Tis0)
[3] [https://www.linkedin.com](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/xuewu-liu_major-update-chlorine-dioxide-is-a-medical-activity-7389185201068998656-GtC9)
[4] [https://www.linkedin.com](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/xuewu-liu_title-the-three-core-mechanisms-of-chlorine-activity-7320457413210357762-c32t)
[5] [https://www.linkedin.com](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/xuewu-liu_three-legal-pathways-for-bringing-the-intratumoral-activity-7361287577452068866-4t5k)
[6] [https://pioneerworksbroadcast.substack.com](https://pioneerworksbroadcast.substack.com/p/the-horrors-of-ultrasound-technology)
This page contains significant medical misinformation and is essentially an advertisement designed to sell pills. Independent scientists, fact-checkers, and cancer researchers have thoroughly debunked the claims made in this post. [1, 2, 3, 4]
The "study" being cited does not prove that ivermectin or mebendazole treats cancer. Instead, it uses flawed math and highly biased methods to trick readers into buying expensive alternative health products. [1, 3]
## Why the Claims in the Post are False
Medical experts and health researchers have pointed out several major reasons why this report is completely unreliable:
* No Control Group: The study did not compare patients taking ivermectin to patients who were not taking it. Many of the patients in the study were actively receiving standard, proven medical care like chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery at the same time. The study took credit for their health improvements, ignoring the fact that their actual cancer treatments were what was helping them. [4, 5, 6]
* Unverified, Self-Reported Surveys: The researchers did not look at medical records, X-rays, or actual doctor reports. Instead, they relied on self-reported online surveys. If a patient filled out a survey saying they felt "better," the authors counted that as a successful cancer treatment. [3, 4]
* Massive Conflicts of Interest: The study was authored by individuals tied to The Wellness Company, an organization that directly profits by selling the exact high-dose ivermectin and mebendazole pills advertised at the bottom of the article. [1]
* Scientific Pushback: Major health organizations have confirmed that there is absolutely zero reliable clinical evidence showing that antiparasitic drugs cure or treat cancer in humans. Shortly after the paper was published, the scientific journal issued an official "Expression of Concern" because other scientists raised serious alarms about how the data was handled. [4, 7, 8, 9]
## The Danger of This Misinformation
Oncologists (cancer doctors) warn that taking unproven drugs like ivermectin can be highly dangerous for cancer patients. It can cause severe liver damage and interact badly with real chemotherapy treatments, making them less effective. Tragically, some patients delay or completely abandon proven medical care because they are misled by online advertisements disguised as "breakthrough scientific studies". [1, 10, 11]
If you are researching options for yourself or a loved one, what specific questions or types of cancer treatments are you looking to understand better?
[1] [https://www.newsfromthestates.com](https://www.newsfromthestates.com/article/ivermectin-isnt-cancer-miracle-drug-influencers-claim-otherwise-good-science-takes-time)
[2] [https://www.yahoo.com](https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/fact-check-preprint-claiming-84-030817813.html)
[3] [https://www.yahoo.com](https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/fact-check-preprint-claiming-84-030817813.html)
[4] [https://health.yahoo.com](https://health.yahoo.com/conditions/cancer/articles/ivermectin-isn-t-cancer-miracle-183846485.html)
[5] [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42203321/)
[6] [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42203321/)
[7] [https://apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-ivermectin-nih-cancer-cure-629592291079)
[8] [https://patient.info](https://patient.info/features/cancer/ivermectin-explained)
[9] [https://www.instagram.com](https://www.instagram.com/p/DYR6dXGDiX1/)
[10] [https://binaytara.org](https://binaytara.org/cancernews/article/what-cancer-doctors-are-saying-about-ivermectin-and-cancer-treatment)
[11] [https://www.youtube.com](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHcZ6TRR9xE&t=5)
So Nixon’s War on Cancer was TOTALLY WASTED—-LOOKING for a VIRUS..
FOR YEARS and BILLIONS… so they could do a stinking VAXX….. ttyl
I don't trust a criminal company like Merck who is the maker of Ivermectin. Trusting one criminal organization over another isn't a wise move in my opinion. There are many articles on Ivermectin. Here are a few- https://www.bitchute.com/video/bCXPbATdSqUN
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Xf5SnO46v5rG
https://www.bitchute.com/video/UBEBs1rTDsIy
This page contains significant medical misinformation and is essentially an advertisement designed to sell pills. Independent scientists, fact-checkers, and cancer researchers have thoroughly debunked the claims made in this post. [1, 2, 3, 4]
The "study" being cited does not prove that ivermectin or mebendazole treats cancer. Instead, it uses flawed math and highly biased methods to trick readers into buying expensive alternative health products. [1, 3]
## Why the Claims in the Post are False
Medical experts and health researchers have pointed out several major reasons why this report is completely unreliable:
* No Control Group: The study did not compare patients taking ivermectin to patients who were not taking it. Many of the patients in the study were actively receiving standard, proven medical care like chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery at the same time. The study took credit for their health improvements, ignoring the fact that their actual cancer treatments were what was helping them. [4, 5, 6]
* Unverified, Self-Reported Surveys: The researchers did not look at medical records, X-rays, or actual doctor reports. Instead, they relied on self-reported online surveys. If a patient filled out a survey saying they felt "better," the authors counted that as a successful cancer treatment. [3, 4]
* Massive Conflicts of Interest: The study was authored by individuals tied to The Wellness Company, an organization that directly profits by selling the exact high-dose ivermectin and mebendazole pills advertised at the bottom of the article. [1]
* Scientific Pushback: Major health organizations have confirmed that there is absolutely zero reliable clinical evidence showing that antiparasitic drugs cure or treat cancer in humans. Shortly after the paper was published, the scientific journal issued an official "Expression of Concern" because other scientists raised serious alarms about how the data was handled. [4, 7, 8, 9]
## The Danger of This Misinformation
Oncologists (cancer doctors) warn that taking unproven drugs like ivermectin can be highly dangerous for cancer patients. It can cause severe liver damage and interact badly with real chemotherapy treatments, making them less effective. Tragically, some patients delay or completely abandon proven medical care because they are misled by online advertisements disguised as "breakthrough scientific studies". [1, 10, 11]
If you are researching options for yourself or a loved one, what specific questions or types of cancer treatments are you looking to understand better?
[1] [https://www.newsfromthestates.com](https://www.newsfromthestates.com/article/ivermectin-isnt-cancer-miracle-drug-influencers-claim-otherwise-good-science-takes-time)
[2] [https://www.yahoo.com](https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/fact-check-preprint-claiming-84-030817813.html)
[3] [https://www.yahoo.com](https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/fact-check-preprint-claiming-84-030817813.html)
[4] [https://health.yahoo.com](https://health.yahoo.com/conditions/cancer/articles/ivermectin-isn-t-cancer-miracle-183846485.html)
[5] [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42203321/)
[6] [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42203321/)
[7] [https://apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-ivermectin-nih-cancer-cure-629592291079)
[8] [https://patient.info](https://patient.info/features/cancer/ivermectin-explained)
[9] [https://www.instagram.com](https://www.instagram.com/p/DYR6dXGDiX1/)
[10] [https://binaytara.org](https://binaytara.org/cancernews/article/what-cancer-doctors-are-saying-about-ivermectin-and-cancer-treatment)
[11] [https://www.youtube.com](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHcZ6TRR9xE&t=5)
Many good statements here. Ivermectin and related types of medications have never been proven to cure cancer or relieve symptoms, But Chemo is an absolute disaster as well. Its failure rate is enormous. My own experience is that my mother, my brother and my stepfather were all murdered through Chemo. Along with the fact that my mother was Severely burned in her lungs with radiation. These have proven to be terrible treatments. And with the billions used to find supposed treatments for cancer, Cancer cases continue to increase. These protocol are not the answer, but they do make billions for criminal Big Pharma, so they won’t go away.
Cancer is a psyop as 90% of the test results are false positives.
I’m not talking about chemo which is the same shit as poisonous ivermectin.
I fly to India and back for mine. It’s cheaper and I get a holiday.
This page contains significant medical misinformation and is essentially an advertisement designed to sell pills. Independent scientists, fact-checkers, and cancer researchers have thoroughly debunked the claims made in this post. [1, 2, 3, 4]
The "study" being cited does not prove that ivermectin or mebendazole treats cancer. Instead, it uses flawed math and highly biased methods to trick readers into buying expensive alternative health products. [1, 3]
## Why the Claims in the Post are False
Medical experts and health researchers have pointed out several major reasons why this report is completely unreliable:
* No Control Group: The study did not compare patients taking ivermectin to patients who were not taking it. Many of the patients in the study were actively receiving standard, proven medical care like chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery at the same time. The study took credit for their health improvements, ignoring the fact that their actual cancer treatments were what was helping them. [4, 5, 6]
* Unverified, Self-Reported Surveys: The researchers did not look at medical records, X-rays, or actual doctor reports. Instead, they relied on self-reported online surveys. If a patient filled out a survey saying they felt "better," the authors counted that as a successful cancer treatment. [3, 4]
* Massive Conflicts of Interest: The study was authored by individuals tied to The Wellness Company, an organization that directly profits by selling the exact high-dose ivermectin and mebendazole pills advertised at the bottom of the article. [1]
* Scientific Pushback: Major health organizations have confirmed that there is absolutely zero reliable clinical evidence showing that antiparasitic drugs cure or treat cancer in humans. Shortly after the paper was published, the scientific journal issued an official "Expression of Concern" because other scientists raised serious alarms about how the data was handled. [4, 7, 8, 9]
## The Danger of This Misinformation
Oncologists (cancer doctors) warn that taking unproven drugs like ivermectin can be highly dangerous for cancer patients. It can cause severe liver damage and interact badly with real chemotherapy treatments, making them less effective. Tragically, some patients delay or completely abandon proven medical care because they are misled by online advertisements disguised as "breakthrough scientific studies". [1, 10, 11]
If you are researching options for yourself or a loved one, what specific questions or types of cancer treatments are you looking to understand better?
[1] [https://www.newsfromthestates.com](https://www.newsfromthestates.com/article/ivermectin-isnt-cancer-miracle-drug-influencers-claim-otherwise-good-science-takes-time)
[2] [https://www.yahoo.com](https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/fact-check-preprint-claiming-84-030817813.html)
[3] [https://www.yahoo.com](https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/fact-check-preprint-claiming-84-030817813.html)
[4] [https://health.yahoo.com](https://health.yahoo.com/conditions/cancer/articles/ivermectin-isn-t-cancer-miracle-183846485.html)
[5] [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42203321/)
[6] [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42203321/)
[7] [https://apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-ivermectin-nih-cancer-cure-629592291079)
[8] [https://patient.info](https://patient.info/features/cancer/ivermectin-explained)
[9] [https://www.instagram.com](https://www.instagram.com/p/DYR6dXGDiX1/)
[10] [https://binaytara.org](https://binaytara.org/cancernews/article/what-cancer-doctors-are-saying-about-ivermectin-and-cancer-treatment)
[11] [https://www.youtube.com](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHcZ6TRR9xE&t=5)
excerpt: "and the Physcian had to SEARCH for a nodule big enough to get a sample from, and the ONE that he found was at the bottom of her left lung that he said was only a few centimeters wide".
ONLY a few centimeters wide - you mean more than an inch?? did this person mean millimeters? (2.54 cm/inch)
The 4+4+9% does not seem to make much sense, missing digits perhaps, not a good look. Looked at the paper abstract and could not find it there immediately. Odd. The 84.4% was there though.
Lots of “xx.4” numbers, apparently missing first two digits like you said!
https://ar.iiarjournals.org/content/46/6/3243
yes. such a small effect (if not a typo) does not sound significant at all.
Great news which will probably be ignored or suppressed