Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kalle Pihlajasaari's avatar

The 4+4+9% does not seem to make much sense, missing digits perhaps, not a good look. Looked at the paper abstract and could not find it there immediately. Odd. The 84.4% was there though.

Joseph A Gorski's avatar

Great news which will probably be ignored or suppressed

29 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?