Contact me by personal email please 🙏 I know you are rich and Jewish and doctor lady famous obviously ok but this is a very serious theological question for a Jewish perspective about the Tribe of Ruben in future prophecy. I literally need a Jew so much and Can't find one to answer or get me the answer from a rabbi???🙏👑☦️🙌❤️💜🌄🌹
his failure to find the good polling that showed trump had a chance in 2016 shows he's a myopic seeker. glad to listen. overall, his CIA thesis is reasonable. I'd suggest a conversation with Rich Baris for him to talk about the specific methods used by “mainstream” polling. Rich can help him out.
Yet archaeology suggests quite a different situation —one in which the golden age of tribal and Davidic fidelity to YH WH was a late religious ideal, not a historical reality.
Instead of a restoration, the evidence suggests that a centralized monarchy and national religion focused in Jerusalem took centuries to develop and was new in Hezekiah's day. The idolatry of the people of Judah was not a departure from their earlier monotheism.
An effective interviewer asks insightful and open-ended questions and then allows the guest to respond without interruption, interjection , confirming agreement "noises" ( right, yes, hmm.) so that the importance of the guest's message can be absorbed by the audience. We already have a sense of Naomi's opinion or knowledge on every topic she chooses. I want to learn more about the guest's topic not only his or her background. A few additional questions or probing statements are often needed to redirect the "conversation" BUT let the guest talk!
Also just to note that the Tribalism that Mark spoke about that they needed Trump to get that mentality started over Covid is the same type of Tribalism that causes Democrats to be against election integrity.
I agree with both Naomi and Mark. I believe in our Constitutional Republic which has been in danger for several decades. I agree that the Bush election was fraudulent and that was the beginning of the rollout of the voting machines which are known to be susceptible to being compromised and changing the votes. I don't think we have been electing anyone since Bush. I agree that our enemy is the billionaire globalists and their big money has compromise our politicians, bureaucrats and our mainstream media. I have followed Naomi for many years and really got interested when she became a critic of the NDAA and how it subverted our Constitutional Rights. I followed Mark on Facebook in the early days of Covid, then when he switched to Substack because Facebook was censoring him. I will always support truth tellers regardless of their political affiliations.
Wow! Naomi great interview. From a person whose background is not the usual and yet he has the intellectual integrity to weather the storm for his perspective . . . so inspiring.
ICE is not going in to pick a fight with anyone. It's the Democrat politicians whose rhetoric has encouraged people to resist ICE offices and hinder their ability to carry out their duties to the point where some have taken to violence. When that happens ICE has no option but to respond in strength. The lives of ICE agents have been put on the line by the rhetoric of Democrats and the Democrats supporting media. They are doing this because their money laundering fraud schemes have been exposed and at the root of it is illegal immigration. They are clearly trying to incite a Civil War, or to put it in modern terms, a Color Revolution and same kind that the Obama Administration used to overthrow the Russian friendly president of Ukraine.
Naomi, if I am not mistaken hasn’t Crispin-Miller jumped on the hate Israel train (same one Candance Owens, Nick Fuentes, and Tucker Carlson boarded?) I stopped paying attention to him after noticing it in his emails to readers. Also do not like his frequent anti-Trump commentary either. Would he have preferred Kamala and Company?
I've followed Mark ever since the early days of Covid. I did not notice though his "I hate Israel" campaign. I do think sometimes a dislike for the Israeli intelligence alignment with Epstein and their influence on US policy to engage in those regime change wars justified by 911 which was obviously an inside job, gets perceived as an "I hate Israel" narrative. I support Israel as a nation and its right to defend itself against its enemies. But after what I saw what the Netanyahu administration did during Covid and his attempts to involve the US in regime change wars, I do not support him. I think he is evil and corrupt.
Insightful interview here, and on the whole, I acknowledge the value of work by Professor Miller and would suggest that people follow his Substack, especially on COVID matters.
[some criticism, however, trying not to be too harsh]
While I applaud Professor Miller for standing for truth for so long, especially on COVID, it pains me to note that there is an unfortunate narrow-mindedness which can come after one becomes "too much of an expert." There is a tragedy of riches, but also one of "expertise." Sometimes a learned man gets so caught up in pet theories that critical thinking skills decay.
Subjects like a potential role of China should never be addressed with flippant answers such as the one he gave during the interview -- saying something to the effect that it is too much of a stretch, or whatever. It borders on being polemic and suggests shallow-thinking or a feeble defense of a pet theory which holds too much sway over one's emotions.
Those kinds of flippant answers are expected from people not previously interested in deep matters, but they can be revealing when coming from a learned man supposedly adept at critical thinking. It overlooks General Mark Milley secretly calling China, and evidence of China involvement in MN protests -- along with the election integrity interest mentioned by Naomi.
You have to be wedded to a pet theory to overlook the evidence of China's influence in the US.
Contact me by personal email please 🙏 I know you are rich and Jewish and doctor lady famous obviously ok but this is a very serious theological question for a Jewish perspective about the Tribe of Ruben in future prophecy. I literally need a Jew so much and Can't find one to answer or get me the answer from a rabbi???🙏👑☦️🙌❤️💜🌄🌹
These’s a saying that goes “don’t expect someone to see something when their livelihood depends on them not seeing it”. Or something like that.
Mark is a good example of someone who doesn’t do that, which speaks volumes about his character and belief that truth matters.
There was something very touching about this couple which permeated the interview. Mark is paying the price for honesty as also Dr Wolf.
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happi-ness.— “ https://substack.com/@oscaralbarranperez/note/p-185899412?r=771sc0&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
his failure to find the good polling that showed trump had a chance in 2016 shows he's a myopic seeker. glad to listen. overall, his CIA thesis is reasonable. I'd suggest a conversation with Rich Baris for him to talk about the specific methods used by “mainstream” polling. Rich can help him out.
Yet archaeology suggests quite a different situation —one in which the golden age of tribal and Davidic fidelity to YH WH was a late religious ideal, not a historical reality.
Instead of a restoration, the evidence suggests that a centralized monarchy and national religion focused in Jerusalem took centuries to develop and was new in Hezekiah's day. The idolatry of the people of Judah was not a departure from their earlier monotheism.
https://open.substack.com/pub/oscaralbarranperez/p/the-transformation-of-judah-930-705?r=771sc0&utm_medium=ios
Really exciting about the movie!
great interview, thanks Naomi.
An effective interviewer asks insightful and open-ended questions and then allows the guest to respond without interruption, interjection , confirming agreement "noises" ( right, yes, hmm.) so that the importance of the guest's message can be absorbed by the audience. We already have a sense of Naomi's opinion or knowledge on every topic she chooses. I want to learn more about the guest's topic not only his or her background. A few additional questions or probing statements are often needed to redirect the "conversation" BUT let the guest talk!
Also just to note that the Tribalism that Mark spoke about that they needed Trump to get that mentality started over Covid is the same type of Tribalism that causes Democrats to be against election integrity.
I agree with both Naomi and Mark. I believe in our Constitutional Republic which has been in danger for several decades. I agree that the Bush election was fraudulent and that was the beginning of the rollout of the voting machines which are known to be susceptible to being compromised and changing the votes. I don't think we have been electing anyone since Bush. I agree that our enemy is the billionaire globalists and their big money has compromise our politicians, bureaucrats and our mainstream media. I have followed Naomi for many years and really got interested when she became a critic of the NDAA and how it subverted our Constitutional Rights. I followed Mark on Facebook in the early days of Covid, then when he switched to Substack because Facebook was censoring him. I will always support truth tellers regardless of their political affiliations.
Wow! Naomi great interview. From a person whose background is not the usual and yet he has the intellectual integrity to weather the storm for his perspective . . . so inspiring.
D Wolf. As per your broadcast yesterday on ICE - what if they are good cop bad cop - ing us.
So basically you have Biden let all these people in - and then that gives Trump excuse to send in ICE to pick fights with people??
ICE is not going in to pick a fight with anyone. It's the Democrat politicians whose rhetoric has encouraged people to resist ICE offices and hinder their ability to carry out their duties to the point where some have taken to violence. When that happens ICE has no option but to respond in strength. The lives of ICE agents have been put on the line by the rhetoric of Democrats and the Democrats supporting media. They are doing this because their money laundering fraud schemes have been exposed and at the root of it is illegal immigration. They are clearly trying to incite a Civil War, or to put it in modern terms, a Color Revolution and same kind that the Obama Administration used to overthrow the Russian friendly president of Ukraine.
Naomi, if I am not mistaken hasn’t Crispin-Miller jumped on the hate Israel train (same one Candance Owens, Nick Fuentes, and Tucker Carlson boarded?) I stopped paying attention to him after noticing it in his emails to readers. Also do not like his frequent anti-Trump commentary either. Would he have preferred Kamala and Company?
I've followed Mark ever since the early days of Covid. I did not notice though his "I hate Israel" campaign. I do think sometimes a dislike for the Israeli intelligence alignment with Epstein and their influence on US policy to engage in those regime change wars justified by 911 which was obviously an inside job, gets perceived as an "I hate Israel" narrative. I support Israel as a nation and its right to defend itself against its enemies. But after what I saw what the Netanyahu administration did during Covid and his attempts to involve the US in regime change wars, I do not support him. I think he is evil and corrupt.
I’ve noticed the same thing.
The tip to look at the board of directors of NYU was right on.
In general, whenever you want to know who controls an organization, see who makes up the board.
Insightful interview here, and on the whole, I acknowledge the value of work by Professor Miller and would suggest that people follow his Substack, especially on COVID matters.
[some criticism, however, trying not to be too harsh]
While I applaud Professor Miller for standing for truth for so long, especially on COVID, it pains me to note that there is an unfortunate narrow-mindedness which can come after one becomes "too much of an expert." There is a tragedy of riches, but also one of "expertise." Sometimes a learned man gets so caught up in pet theories that critical thinking skills decay.
Subjects like a potential role of China should never be addressed with flippant answers such as the one he gave during the interview -- saying something to the effect that it is too much of a stretch, or whatever. It borders on being polemic and suggests shallow-thinking or a feeble defense of a pet theory which holds too much sway over one's emotions.
Those kinds of flippant answers are expected from people not previously interested in deep matters, but they can be revealing when coming from a learned man supposedly adept at critical thinking. It overlooks General Mark Milley secretly calling China, and evidence of China involvement in MN protests -- along with the election integrity interest mentioned by Naomi.
You have to be wedded to a pet theory to overlook the evidence of China's influence in the US.