The Russia Hoax started basically the same way and the Beast was directly involved in dumping that load of BS known as the Steele Dossier which was leaked to them by the FBI who then used the article to request a FISA Warrant.
Maybe instead we should reconsider how we view our elected representatives, for that is what they are, representatives, not leaders. They are not here to teach us how to live, they are here to enact our will, on our behalf. Adults need to stop acting like sheep and looking for someone to lead them and tell them how to live. We already have a leader, he's already told us how to live. Politicians and govt are our servants, not our leaders.
I have expressed my perspective on many substacks concerning the destruction of our Constitution and indeed human civilization across the world as being the work of an alien Intervention that has been entrenched in our world since the end of WWII—at least. This is described in the four books of The AlliesofHumanity.org Briefings. They are free to read online and are essential education needed to identify our real enemy. I am including this 12-point summary of the four sets of Briefings. This summary represents only a general overview and does not include many of the important details which make complete comprehension of the Allies Briefings possible.
1)Humanity’s destiny is to emerge into and to engage with a Greater Community of intelligent life in the universe.
2)Contact with other forms of intelligent life represents the greatest threshold that humanity has ever faced. The results of this Contact will determine humanity’s future for generations to come. This Contact is happening now.
3)Humanity is unprepared for Contact. Researchers are still unable to clearly see who is visiting our world and why. Governments are not revealing what they know, and most people are still in denial that this phenomenon is even occurring.
4)Because of this lack of preparation, humanity’s true Allies sent representatives to a location near Earth to observe the extraterrestrial presence and activities within our world. The Allies of Humanity Briefings represent their report.
5)The Briefings reveal that our world is undergoing an extraterrestrial Intervention by forces who, as demonstrated by their actions, are here to subvert human authority and to integrate into human societies for their own advantage. These forces represent non-military organizations who are here to seek human and biological resources. The Allies refer to these forces as the “Collectives.” The Collectives do not value human freedom.
6)Because the Intervention is being carried out by small groups of intervening forces, it must rely primarily upon deception and persuasion to achieve its goals. The Allies Briefings describe in detail how this is being accomplished and what we must do to stop it.
7)This extraterrestrial Intervention is being focused in four arenas:
It is influencing certain individuals in positions of power and authority in government, commerce and religion to cooperate with the Intervention through the promise of greater wealth, power and technology
It is creating hidden establishments in the world from which the Intervention can exert its influence in the mental environment, seeking to make people everywhere open and compliant to its will through a “Pacification Program”
It is manipulating our religious values and spiritual impulses in order to gain human allegiance to their cause
It is taking people against their will, and often without their awareness, to support an interbreeding program designed to create a hybrid race and a new leadership who would be bonded to the “visitors.
8)Those extraterrestrial visitors who have been potentially beneficial to humanity have all retreated from the world in the face of the Intervention. Those remaining are alien races who are not here for our benefit. This leaves us in an unambiguous situation regarding the intentions and activities of the extraterrestrial presence. This enables us to clearly see what we are dealing with. Otherwise, it would be impossible for us to tell friend from foe.
9)The Allies Briefings emphasize the grave danger in our accepting and becoming reliant upon ET technology offered by the Intervention. This will only lead to our becoming dependent on the “visitors,” resulting in our loss of freedom and self-sufficiency. No true ally of humanity would offer this to us. The Allies emphasize that we have earth-based solutions to all the problems that we face. What we lack as a race are unity, will and cooperation.
10)In spite of the great challenge we now face, humanity still has a great advantage if we can respond in time. The Allies Briefings reveal both the Intervention’s strengths and its weaknesses. One of the Intervention’s weaknesses is its reliance upon human acquiescence and cooperation to achieve its goals. According to Greater Community rules of conduct within the region of space in which our world exists, Intervention is not allowed unless it can be demonstrated that the native people welcome and approve of it. Here our voices can have power in the Greater Community. At this moment, the Intervention has few critics. But if enough people can become aware of it and speak out against it, the Intervention will be thwarted and must withdraw. This is the first step in humanity’s preparation for dealing with the realities of life in the universe. This step and all the steps that follow give humanity its one great chance to overcome its longstanding conflicts and to unite in its own defense for the preservation of the world. The Allies emphasize that we as human beings have the spiritual and collective power to do this, and that we must do this if we want to survive and advance as a free and independent race in the universe.
11)Preparation for our contact with the Greater Community begins with awareness, education, and Knowledge, our spiritual Mind.
12)In facing the Greater Community, humanity must build unity, self-sufficiency and discretion. These are the three requirements that all free nations must establish to be free in the universe.
___________________________
“If humanity were well versed in Greater Community affairs, you would resist any visitation to your world unless a mutual agreement had been established previously. You would know enough not to allow your world to be so vulnerable.”
The Allies of Humanity, Book One: The Third Briefing
If you are interested in what the Bible says, and your posts indicate this, perhaps you should realize that concern for the moral life of a political figure, or any leader of any kind is entirely biblical.
of course it does hinge on the nature of the concern and how applied as i wrote earlier
I would invite you to consider if your stance here is compatible with the bible you are so interested in here.
if politics is worth getting involved in and i grow to the view that biblically it is not, then we are to discern a person by his fruit.
EVERYONE.
The American vehicle of state is , so to speak, running on the last fumes in the tank of what it thought was a Christian government. It never was but that is another story
so judging the character of a candidate or office holder is a remnant, however debased , of this principle it seems to me.
I am moderately in favour of a completely secular government
We have one here in NZ. It is godless as all governments are, but it does not pretend to anything other than godlessness
as righteousness never came by law of any kind Government is irrelevant to anything other than the minimal maintenance of civil order.
I would hope you are consistent to your own principle and would not condemn of private life of any politician, presumably of the Right.
It is very easy to declare that the private life of those we support is irrelevant but start screaming for blood if a politician we oppose had a mistress or other such,
and alas this is not a matter of intelligence, but of passion, which will always overrule intelligence when powerful enough
I do distinguish, to clarify my expression on this issue, between on one hand the lives of someone merely doing a service based on a technical skill, as in a plumber or a musician (I was a musician) and someone on the other hand who seeks to rule a nation or society or teach men how to live
the private life of a plumber is of no relevance. He can be an unmitigated swine in private as long as he unblocks my drain. A musician can be a monster ( and I have known some, , seriously!!!) but as long as he performs when the money is being laid on the counter his character is of no relevance
Tolstoy was one of the world's greatest novelists.
But late in life he set himself up as a teacher of men, and his life made him a complete hypocrite given the nature of his teaching. He publicly turned against sex in his religious and political writings, but the announcement of the THIRTEENTH pregnancy of his wife ( he was an aristocrat and as a writer a public figure) made him a laughing stock.
A national leader is not merely performing a technical skill like plumbing or fiddling or acting.
he is leading PEOPLE and regarding that character is paramount for bad character either makes him a villain or a hypocrite.
and in moral issues as opposed to mere issues of fact hypocrisy though it does not invalidate the truth said by the accused hypocrite it does obliterate his right to speak.
do you want people of bad character to run your country??
I could in irony point out that that is all any will ever get for not only does power corrupt but it attracts the corruptible
His private life mattered.
America is an utterly corrupt pest hole. You yourself have chronicled the lawlessness of the establishment response to covid.
Are you telling me their private lives of indicators of lawlessness, even if not to full criminality is not relevant?
Off course, Teddy Roosevelt's words come to mind. They absolutely describe Bobby Kennedy to a "T". Yes, others will stand on the sidelines, sit in the bleachers pointing out the errors in this man's character, afraid to get into the arena and really engage with life. Not so Robert Kennedy Jr. He will give his all to this because he has such devotion for our country, Constitution and our people. I'm sure he has had many women trailing after him. All leaders who exude the strength and power that it takes to lead will have this. I suspect that Bobby has fallen into that pit far less than many others--but I agree with Naomi. Would we have them be Angelic beings who don't have the deep investment and experience in this realm that it takes to be good leaders? Read these words from T. Roosevelt and see if they don't describe this devoted servant of Democracy: “It is not the critic who counts: not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short again and again, because there is no effort without error or shortcoming, but who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself in a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who knew neither victory nor defeat.”
Attn: all Naomi Wolf fans. As an ex-student of Marx (as well as doctors S. Freud and Wilhelm Reich) I would rather not hear this: "the Marxist migration of language into weaponized meaninglessness" It is true that Marx used a lot of sophisticated language and a lot of it is a real stretch. And we need to drop about half of it. Some of it is still good. So don't just do that with Marx. He was a man of his time and this is how history went. The "Marxists" know as little of the real Marx and the "Freudians" know of the real Freud. Marx had a great influence for many years. Let's turn the page and keep some of Marx and shake our head in wonder at other parts of his doctrine, wondering how he could have said it. But everything happening now, these completely false leftists or persons wrongly saying they are "left" when they are not at all "left" should not be attributed to a man who lived in 1840-1860 or so. Why is everything Marx's fault? Come on now. In what sense are these doofus 'Woke' idiots marxist? Marx was a real scholar, he was dedicated and wanted human betterment. He was a pretty good family man too. And a family man who also could apparently help himself and there was something physically intimate with the maid. Yeah: intimate it was, I'll bet! But he lived an honorable life and his daughter carried his work forward as well. He must not have been a total monster. Why blame Marx for what is happening today? He is not perfect, but he is not fit to be made the target of all blame. Many, many things have happened since Marx's time.
* Lots of talk, but nothing that shows that RFKJr did anything wrong.
Is that fair?
And, I am disposed to believe this.
In earlier times: I think I understand correctly that RFKJr has committed adultery in the past, so there is that basis to SUSPECT he did so here. I would blame RFKjr no more than I blame Mark Cuban for being beguiled. But, of course, we all can grow.
But: about RFKJr in this case, so far we have only gossip and insinuation, or so I currently think. Nothing even so clear as the video of Mark Cuban's smile (of smittenship).
***
I have read other info that exonerates RFKJr more in this episode. Eg, he blocked her multiple times.
Have you?
What is the state of play now?
***
My goal: I think a number of things RFKjr is saying are important (I do not agree with him on everything).
First, I want to call out and support those ideas.
Second, if (as I currently think) these are unfair ad hominem attacks, I wish to defend him in that way. If they are "fair" ad hominem attacks, then I will defend his ideas as being attacked illogically.
Agreed: No one is perfect, and it is our delusion to think someone is (and usually we are also deluding ourselves about our own "perfections".) I would never propose politicians as the more ethical profession (compared to almost any other). Dylan not doubt hints there is more honor amongst thieves.
Yes, if we can, let us support people who are more ethical, especially as it regards the office they will hold.
***
"Ocular proof." Hmm. Perhaps Harold Bloom would smile at that reference, and the tragedy around it, of false accusations of infidelity.
All men have dicks and we can't help it. There is another article about Nuzzi as well. Nuzzi was stalking and provoking him. She combines seduction with journalism. It is really about the bad journalistic practices of V. Nuzzi. You are BAD GIRL!!!!!#
What is your idea of nonfiction? I liked the way your pieces make a single point --- then just end. So really I mean what do you think logic should be? Making one point is fine. I am tired of most of this writing that is all the same and your writing is a little different but it seems your writing does not bother really thinking the position through, i.e. your ideas. Yes, thinking is hard work, and I do not particularly like it either. Persons appear to be thinking so competently ---maybe there is some professional ritual they do. But if they are really thinking the topic through why do their pieces all come out sounding the same? Something's up!
Your ideas, on the other hand, seem to come from out of nowhere. It doesn't matter about Substack. They are libertarian anyhow; they don't care. So don't worry about Substack but just worry about your own art form. For example: I follow RFK and he appears to hold up as a truly sincere person and it is just horrible that the mainstream press tries to discredit him, like with this new thing Nuzzi is doing to him. Why do you say he is slimy? He is not presidential. I do not think so, and so he was not able to make enough persons come over to voting for him. He could not win at that so he won't be president of American (US). But on the other hand he seems to be a good person is ways other persons are not. No one cares, right? Instead they try to take him down. I think he is a sincere, truthful person. Maybe he is just fooling me; I don't know. If you on the other hand just decide a person is "slimy" and then publish it there could be consequences. You are subjecting others to your opinion. That is not fair and Substack will call you on it. We want to read something new and different and worthwhile.
If you like writing you should stick with your art form and see where it leads you.
Could you put up a new piece or is Substack blocking your writing? Just apologize and ask them to let you start over.
I am also wondering what their limits are and I am hoping that what happend to you (your pieces say everybody blocks you) does not happen to me. Or did it even really happen at all?
It is a crazy world so do not expect it to make sense. But for yourself, on your part, just try to make sense yourself. You can play with Substack's expectations. They are all part of the same big game, after all. They have not objected to my work.
I don't know if I will ever get more than ten or fifteen interested people reading me but I do know I have to play by the rules.
Substack deleted my original account along with all of my comments and so I lost interest in it. I dared to question Taibbi during the Twitter Files and they didn’t want anyone attacking their cash cow.
Just because you questioned Taibbi or was there something in your style that offended them? Try to understand what is actually bothering them. You are also saying as of 2023 that the vaccines are just fine. Many disagree there. I was still touching up my comment so read my comment again now. Please...
The ad hominem is conclusive evidence, as Christopher Hitchens used to say, that your interlocutor has lost the argument. It's a great sign that you've hit the target, you've made waves and you're winning.
Hi Naomi - I read this article and also watched your follow up video with advice💪👏👏. You mentioned you had thoughts about Jessica Reed Kraus’s article/reporting. I’d love to hear your thoughts on it. I feel very disappointed and surprised that someone at her age and close proximity to RFK team was not more skeptical and careful about Olivia. I don’t know what exactly she shared with Nuzzi but it sounds like she divulged sensitive information that she shouldn’t have. I wonder if team Kennedy is upset with her?? Curious to hear your feedback.
Kraus said she was "friends" with Nuzzi. This is about the social circles of journalism, the social life of the profession. They spend as much time socializing as they do reporting and Nuzzi went over the line. After all, she sent HIM the photos. He never responded. Maybe he thought is was funny, so he shared the experience with other persons, not thinking anything more of it. The fault is with Nuzzi, not understanding how adult behave. Again: RFK did not answer any of these texts. He blocked her and then unblicked her or something like that. I think there are certain assumptiong we make, that persons are going to be fair. Nuzzi is a seductress. She failed to make the correct distinctions between persons affairs and public life. Did she get sacked by the mabagzine? New York magazine, right?
yes all true… i was more curious about how this has impacted Jessica’s relationship with Team Kennedy. I feel like something changed bw her the team…’so was wondering if they might be upset with Jessica for sharing sensitive info. We may never know but you can get a feel for how things go from here.
Any time someone, especially a male that demonstrates he is unwilling to fold to the neo-Marxist globohomo narrative, they will soon find themselves the subject matter of racist, homophobic, sexist, and sometimes in their past, accused of sexual impropriety. That’s when you know they are on the correct or right track.
The Russia Hoax started basically the same way and the Beast was directly involved in dumping that load of BS known as the Steele Dossier which was leaked to them by the FBI who then used the article to request a FISA Warrant.
Maybe instead we should reconsider how we view our elected representatives, for that is what they are, representatives, not leaders. They are not here to teach us how to live, they are here to enact our will, on our behalf. Adults need to stop acting like sheep and looking for someone to lead them and tell them how to live. We already have a leader, he's already told us how to live. Politicians and govt are our servants, not our leaders.
brilliant, thank you
Couldn't agree more, thanks for doing the research and making the allegations clear for what they are, more lies to smear an honest candidate.
Two observations:
1.) RFK Jr. is JFK Jr.’s COUSIN - not his uncle.
2.).Why is JFK Jr. listed in a concluding sentence that names 3 former presidents and then him, when he never held that office?
I have expressed my perspective on many substacks concerning the destruction of our Constitution and indeed human civilization across the world as being the work of an alien Intervention that has been entrenched in our world since the end of WWII—at least. This is described in the four books of The AlliesofHumanity.org Briefings. They are free to read online and are essential education needed to identify our real enemy. I am including this 12-point summary of the four sets of Briefings. This summary represents only a general overview and does not include many of the important details which make complete comprehension of the Allies Briefings possible.
1)Humanity’s destiny is to emerge into and to engage with a Greater Community of intelligent life in the universe.
2)Contact with other forms of intelligent life represents the greatest threshold that humanity has ever faced. The results of this Contact will determine humanity’s future for generations to come. This Contact is happening now.
3)Humanity is unprepared for Contact. Researchers are still unable to clearly see who is visiting our world and why. Governments are not revealing what they know, and most people are still in denial that this phenomenon is even occurring.
4)Because of this lack of preparation, humanity’s true Allies sent representatives to a location near Earth to observe the extraterrestrial presence and activities within our world. The Allies of Humanity Briefings represent their report.
5)The Briefings reveal that our world is undergoing an extraterrestrial Intervention by forces who, as demonstrated by their actions, are here to subvert human authority and to integrate into human societies for their own advantage. These forces represent non-military organizations who are here to seek human and biological resources. The Allies refer to these forces as the “Collectives.” The Collectives do not value human freedom.
6)Because the Intervention is being carried out by small groups of intervening forces, it must rely primarily upon deception and persuasion to achieve its goals. The Allies Briefings describe in detail how this is being accomplished and what we must do to stop it.
7)This extraterrestrial Intervention is being focused in four arenas:
It is influencing certain individuals in positions of power and authority in government, commerce and religion to cooperate with the Intervention through the promise of greater wealth, power and technology
It is creating hidden establishments in the world from which the Intervention can exert its influence in the mental environment, seeking to make people everywhere open and compliant to its will through a “Pacification Program”
It is manipulating our religious values and spiritual impulses in order to gain human allegiance to their cause
It is taking people against their will, and often without their awareness, to support an interbreeding program designed to create a hybrid race and a new leadership who would be bonded to the “visitors.
8)Those extraterrestrial visitors who have been potentially beneficial to humanity have all retreated from the world in the face of the Intervention. Those remaining are alien races who are not here for our benefit. This leaves us in an unambiguous situation regarding the intentions and activities of the extraterrestrial presence. This enables us to clearly see what we are dealing with. Otherwise, it would be impossible for us to tell friend from foe.
9)The Allies Briefings emphasize the grave danger in our accepting and becoming reliant upon ET technology offered by the Intervention. This will only lead to our becoming dependent on the “visitors,” resulting in our loss of freedom and self-sufficiency. No true ally of humanity would offer this to us. The Allies emphasize that we have earth-based solutions to all the problems that we face. What we lack as a race are unity, will and cooperation.
10)In spite of the great challenge we now face, humanity still has a great advantage if we can respond in time. The Allies Briefings reveal both the Intervention’s strengths and its weaknesses. One of the Intervention’s weaknesses is its reliance upon human acquiescence and cooperation to achieve its goals. According to Greater Community rules of conduct within the region of space in which our world exists, Intervention is not allowed unless it can be demonstrated that the native people welcome and approve of it. Here our voices can have power in the Greater Community. At this moment, the Intervention has few critics. But if enough people can become aware of it and speak out against it, the Intervention will be thwarted and must withdraw. This is the first step in humanity’s preparation for dealing with the realities of life in the universe. This step and all the steps that follow give humanity its one great chance to overcome its longstanding conflicts and to unite in its own defense for the preservation of the world. The Allies emphasize that we as human beings have the spiritual and collective power to do this, and that we must do this if we want to survive and advance as a free and independent race in the universe.
11)Preparation for our contact with the Greater Community begins with awareness, education, and Knowledge, our spiritual Mind.
12)In facing the Greater Community, humanity must build unity, self-sufficiency and discretion. These are the three requirements that all free nations must establish to be free in the universe.
___________________________
“If humanity were well versed in Greater Community affairs, you would resist any visitation to your world unless a mutual agreement had been established previously. You would know enough not to allow your world to be so vulnerable.”
The Allies of Humanity, Book One: The Third Briefing
www.AlliesofHumanity.org
If you are interested in what the Bible says, and your posts indicate this, perhaps you should realize that concern for the moral life of a political figure, or any leader of any kind is entirely biblical.
of course it does hinge on the nature of the concern and how applied as i wrote earlier
I would invite you to consider if your stance here is compatible with the bible you are so interested in here.
if politics is worth getting involved in and i grow to the view that biblically it is not, then we are to discern a person by his fruit.
EVERYONE.
The American vehicle of state is , so to speak, running on the last fumes in the tank of what it thought was a Christian government. It never was but that is another story
so judging the character of a candidate or office holder is a remnant, however debased , of this principle it seems to me.
I am moderately in favour of a completely secular government
We have one here in NZ. It is godless as all governments are, but it does not pretend to anything other than godlessness
as righteousness never came by law of any kind Government is irrelevant to anything other than the minimal maintenance of civil order.
so what do you want, Ms Wolf?
and what do you think good leadership is?
and what is the relationship of church to state?
You missed the point.
If the point you think I missed was the one Dr Wolf was making then I must reply that to disagree with it is to know what it is.
Indeed to disagree with a point I must in logic know what it is otherwise i could not disagree with it
I know what it is. If you think I do not understand it you must demonstrate how I do not understand it.
OR, if the point you think I missed is something else I would ask you to tell me what it is, I am completely mystified as to what it is
I would hope you are consistent to your own principle and would not condemn of private life of any politician, presumably of the Right.
It is very easy to declare that the private life of those we support is irrelevant but start screaming for blood if a politician we oppose had a mistress or other such,
and alas this is not a matter of intelligence, but of passion, which will always overrule intelligence when powerful enough
I do distinguish, to clarify my expression on this issue, between on one hand the lives of someone merely doing a service based on a technical skill, as in a plumber or a musician (I was a musician) and someone on the other hand who seeks to rule a nation or society or teach men how to live
the private life of a plumber is of no relevance. He can be an unmitigated swine in private as long as he unblocks my drain. A musician can be a monster ( and I have known some, , seriously!!!) but as long as he performs when the money is being laid on the counter his character is of no relevance
Tolstoy was one of the world's greatest novelists.
But late in life he set himself up as a teacher of men, and his life made him a complete hypocrite given the nature of his teaching. He publicly turned against sex in his religious and political writings, but the announcement of the THIRTEENTH pregnancy of his wife ( he was an aristocrat and as a writer a public figure) made him a laughing stock.
A national leader is not merely performing a technical skill like plumbing or fiddling or acting.
he is leading PEOPLE and regarding that character is paramount for bad character either makes him a villain or a hypocrite.
and in moral issues as opposed to mere issues of fact hypocrisy though it does not invalidate the truth said by the accused hypocrite it does obliterate his right to speak.
do you want people of bad character to run your country??
I could in irony point out that that is all any will ever get for not only does power corrupt but it attracts the corruptible
His private life mattered.
America is an utterly corrupt pest hole. You yourself have chronicled the lawlessness of the establishment response to covid.
Are you telling me their private lives of indicators of lawlessness, even if not to full criminality is not relevant?
I invite you to reconsider
Off course, Teddy Roosevelt's words come to mind. They absolutely describe Bobby Kennedy to a "T". Yes, others will stand on the sidelines, sit in the bleachers pointing out the errors in this man's character, afraid to get into the arena and really engage with life. Not so Robert Kennedy Jr. He will give his all to this because he has such devotion for our country, Constitution and our people. I'm sure he has had many women trailing after him. All leaders who exude the strength and power that it takes to lead will have this. I suspect that Bobby has fallen into that pit far less than many others--but I agree with Naomi. Would we have them be Angelic beings who don't have the deep investment and experience in this realm that it takes to be good leaders? Read these words from T. Roosevelt and see if they don't describe this devoted servant of Democracy: “It is not the critic who counts: not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short again and again, because there is no effort without error or shortcoming, but who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself in a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who knew neither victory nor defeat.”
Attn: all Naomi Wolf fans. As an ex-student of Marx (as well as doctors S. Freud and Wilhelm Reich) I would rather not hear this: "the Marxist migration of language into weaponized meaninglessness" It is true that Marx used a lot of sophisticated language and a lot of it is a real stretch. And we need to drop about half of it. Some of it is still good. So don't just do that with Marx. He was a man of his time and this is how history went. The "Marxists" know as little of the real Marx and the "Freudians" know of the real Freud. Marx had a great influence for many years. Let's turn the page and keep some of Marx and shake our head in wonder at other parts of his doctrine, wondering how he could have said it. But everything happening now, these completely false leftists or persons wrongly saying they are "left" when they are not at all "left" should not be attributed to a man who lived in 1840-1860 or so. Why is everything Marx's fault? Come on now. In what sense are these doofus 'Woke' idiots marxist? Marx was a real scholar, he was dedicated and wanted human betterment. He was a pretty good family man too. And a family man who also could apparently help himself and there was something physically intimate with the maid. Yeah: intimate it was, I'll bet! But he lived an honorable life and his daughter carried his work forward as well. He must not have been a total monster. Why blame Marx for what is happening today? He is not perfect, but he is not fit to be made the target of all blame. Many, many things have happened since Marx's time.
@Naomi. Any follow-up on this post?
I read it once, and maybe missed some key points.
My summary of what you said:
* Lots of talk, but nothing that shows that RFKJr did anything wrong.
Is that fair?
And, I am disposed to believe this.
In earlier times: I think I understand correctly that RFKJr has committed adultery in the past, so there is that basis to SUSPECT he did so here. I would blame RFKjr no more than I blame Mark Cuban for being beguiled. But, of course, we all can grow.
But: about RFKJr in this case, so far we have only gossip and insinuation, or so I currently think. Nothing even so clear as the video of Mark Cuban's smile (of smittenship).
***
I have read other info that exonerates RFKJr more in this episode. Eg, he blocked her multiple times.
Have you?
What is the state of play now?
***
My goal: I think a number of things RFKjr is saying are important (I do not agree with him on everything).
First, I want to call out and support those ideas.
Second, if (as I currently think) these are unfair ad hominem attacks, I wish to defend him in that way. If they are "fair" ad hominem attacks, then I will defend his ideas as being attacked illogically.
Agreed: No one is perfect, and it is our delusion to think someone is (and usually we are also deluding ourselves about our own "perfections".) I would never propose politicians as the more ethical profession (compared to almost any other). Dylan not doubt hints there is more honor amongst thieves.
Yes, if we can, let us support people who are more ethical, especially as it regards the office they will hold.
***
"Ocular proof." Hmm. Perhaps Harold Bloom would smile at that reference, and the tragedy around it, of false accusations of infidelity.
RFK is about as slimy as they come…I hope that woman put a condom over her phone when she sexted him!! 🤮
All men have dicks and we can't help it. There is another article about Nuzzi as well. Nuzzi was stalking and provoking him. She combines seduction with journalism. It is really about the bad journalistic practices of V. Nuzzi. You are BAD GIRL!!!!!#
She’s a skank…do you know how I can get in contact with her?? I’m a baaaaaaaaaad boy!!!!
What is your idea of nonfiction? I liked the way your pieces make a single point --- then just end. So really I mean what do you think logic should be? Making one point is fine. I am tired of most of this writing that is all the same and your writing is a little different but it seems your writing does not bother really thinking the position through, i.e. your ideas. Yes, thinking is hard work, and I do not particularly like it either. Persons appear to be thinking so competently ---maybe there is some professional ritual they do. But if they are really thinking the topic through why do their pieces all come out sounding the same? Something's up!
Your ideas, on the other hand, seem to come from out of nowhere. It doesn't matter about Substack. They are libertarian anyhow; they don't care. So don't worry about Substack but just worry about your own art form. For example: I follow RFK and he appears to hold up as a truly sincere person and it is just horrible that the mainstream press tries to discredit him, like with this new thing Nuzzi is doing to him. Why do you say he is slimy? He is not presidential. I do not think so, and so he was not able to make enough persons come over to voting for him. He could not win at that so he won't be president of American (US). But on the other hand he seems to be a good person is ways other persons are not. No one cares, right? Instead they try to take him down. I think he is a sincere, truthful person. Maybe he is just fooling me; I don't know. If you on the other hand just decide a person is "slimy" and then publish it there could be consequences. You are subjecting others to your opinion. That is not fair and Substack will call you on it. We want to read something new and different and worthwhile.
If you like writing you should stick with your art form and see where it leads you.
Could you put up a new piece or is Substack blocking your writing? Just apologize and ask them to let you start over.
I am also wondering what their limits are and I am hoping that what happend to you (your pieces say everybody blocks you) does not happen to me. Or did it even really happen at all?
It is a crazy world so do not expect it to make sense. But for yourself, on your part, just try to make sense yourself. You can play with Substack's expectations. They are all part of the same big game, after all. They have not objected to my work.
I don't know if I will ever get more than ten or fifteen interested people reading me but I do know I have to play by the rules.
Substack deleted my original account along with all of my comments and so I lost interest in it. I dared to question Taibbi during the Twitter Files and they didn’t want anyone attacking their cash cow.
Just because you questioned Taibbi or was there something in your style that offended them? Try to understand what is actually bothering them. You are also saying as of 2023 that the vaccines are just fine. Many disagree there. I was still touching up my comment so read my comment again now. Please...
Same playbook, same formula, don’t matter.
The ad hominem is conclusive evidence, as Christopher Hitchens used to say, that your interlocutor has lost the argument. It's a great sign that you've hit the target, you've made waves and you're winning.
Psychopathic inbred fabian Marxists
Hi Naomi - I read this article and also watched your follow up video with advice💪👏👏. You mentioned you had thoughts about Jessica Reed Kraus’s article/reporting. I’d love to hear your thoughts on it. I feel very disappointed and surprised that someone at her age and close proximity to RFK team was not more skeptical and careful about Olivia. I don’t know what exactly she shared with Nuzzi but it sounds like she divulged sensitive information that she shouldn’t have. I wonder if team Kennedy is upset with her?? Curious to hear your feedback.
Kraus said she was "friends" with Nuzzi. This is about the social circles of journalism, the social life of the profession. They spend as much time socializing as they do reporting and Nuzzi went over the line. After all, she sent HIM the photos. He never responded. Maybe he thought is was funny, so he shared the experience with other persons, not thinking anything more of it. The fault is with Nuzzi, not understanding how adult behave. Again: RFK did not answer any of these texts. He blocked her and then unblicked her or something like that. I think there are certain assumptiong we make, that persons are going to be fair. Nuzzi is a seductress. She failed to make the correct distinctions between persons affairs and public life. Did she get sacked by the mabagzine? New York magazine, right?
yes all true… i was more curious about how this has impacted Jessica’s relationship with Team Kennedy. I feel like something changed bw her the team…’so was wondering if they might be upset with Jessica for sharing sensitive info. We may never know but you can get a feel for how things go from here.
Any time someone, especially a male that demonstrates he is unwilling to fold to the neo-Marxist globohomo narrative, they will soon find themselves the subject matter of racist, homophobic, sexist, and sometimes in their past, accused of sexual impropriety. That’s when you know they are on the correct or right track.