When the government fears the people, there is liberty” is a quote attributed to Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson believed that the government would only respect liberty if it feared losing power. He also said that the people can be trusted with their own government if they are well informed.
Thomas Jefferson's quote
Full quote
“When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. But when the government fears the people, there is liberty”
I am going to make one other observation here that is something to consider.
If this is something that people want, remember that this then alters the dynamic between the People, the States and the Fed. Gov. Not entirely for the better.
Additionally, it would mean that the powers and structure that have bled between these levels will once again be separated out. Not only in Law Enforcement but every other layer of government.
Naomi has truly crossed over as a Patriot here, grasping she has the Right of self defense with a firearm = not controlled by unelected DC Globalist oriented Bureaucrats...!
Now with Dems inviting millions literally from multiple nations releasing their prisons and mental asylums ALL American women are potential victims of assualt, rape, robbery +/or murder...!
Sheriff Mack alluded to the "Clinton Chronicles" of the long list of 80 + - dead people that crossed the Clintons who were murdered mysteriously some in bizarre way's...!
Dr Wolf, 30 years behind the times, again? (Arguably 100 years. Have you read the drug crime cases from the early 20th century?)
Drug prohibition is unconstitutional (read Leary v US, 395 US 6 (1969)). Drug prohibition undergirds ALL thug-life policing. Sheriff Mack is NOT for drug legalization. Hence, he is FOR corruption, fraud, and enslavement. (Anyone read the 13th Amendment?)
Cops have DISCRETION to ignore acts - like voluntary transactions, but hey, why cut off the cops from their graft and military tactics?
Dear Mike, I am sorry, I cannot follow you. I noted that Sheriff Mack, like most POS cops, is all pro-drug war, asset forfeiture all the time. He is NOT pro-liberty. He is PRO-cop. What does that have to do with Dr. Wolf's nonsense about "insurrection"? Best
Got 4 and a half minutes? Watch Dr. Wolf construct the table and then set the table for leftist media narrative that President Trump will cause insurrection and declare martial law, and this based upon Democratic Governors ACTUALLY arrogating Emetgency Powers to themselves. She had a well-spoken and willing dimwit, Forlano, join her in this.
There are sheriff's in Washington state that do not protect their people, protect and enforce election law, nor respond to calls of election malfeasance.
First I must congratulate everybody and America for the great election outcome, the result of much, much work of many, many and it was great to see it all being accomplished in the huge voting turnout. I would say, even Europe is feeling the vibe of hope by this, as America merits many thanks one more time!
Btw surely the good Sheriffs should get all the means they need...
Listening to the good Sheriffs comments about deputizing the church members and then it occurred to me that each state guard unit could also be deputized as protection against federal authority. That would make the full unit to include equipment available to be used as needed. I don’t believe it would ever be needed but the people would love to know that they do have power to protect themselves.
Dear Troy, try "protecting" yourself from Israeli-trained thugs, in military equipment, who decided that your house emits an odor .... Since the 1970s, the drug war + military training for cops have created a hyper police-state. END drug prohibition, END militarized cops. MAKE cops wear pink. The hostility will diminish!
I am hesitant to make too much of a discussion in this because of the complexities involved with constitutional law.
The last time I saw this kind of "Constitutional" verbose, we saw the Bundy Ranch situation and before that other more nefarious stories.
Some of them totally legitimate and some of them questionable. Including the possible if not probably troll.
J6 anyone?
I am not pointing fingers at any specific person making any specific or even spurious claim. Just the fact that alot of government level psyops have taken place in the past several decades, much of it originating in the late 1980's thru today. For this reason I am deeply cautious and filled with a healthy does of skepticism.
Federal unelected bureaucRats(CIA/FBLie/IRS/EPA/BLM/ATF/FDA/AG Dept/Dept of Ed. etc- have run rough shod over citizens since inception under the guise of "protecting the people"...!
Under FBLie Director Hoover wiretapped everyone illegally til they got in the way of his policy like in recent time = Lavoy Finicum, Ruby Ridge, Waco on + on
I have been sending communications to the Trump team on many occasions trying to convince them that the only road back to constitutional life is through the county Sheriffs. I argued that the Sheriffs should be the only authority to arrest anyone in their county. All investigations by federal and state agencies would need to be registered with the Sheriff and monitored for constitutionality. The FBI needs to be dissolved at the leadership role and put under the National Sheriffs Association. Thus giving it more direct power over federal agencies. Raids like Mar-a-Lago would never have happened. If the IRS wants to hurt someone financially they would need to first register their investigation and then the Sherifs team would decide the penalties. They could even strike a deal where the subject could correct whatever the problem was. We only get this one time in history to protect ourselves from tyrants under Trump so lets not miss it.
The Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, a federal law, called for State and local law enforcement officials to conduct background checks people seeking to buy a gun.
Two law enforcement officials from Montana and Arizona challenged the law on constitutional grounds.
The Court of Appeals found the mandatory background check constitutional.
The U.S. Supreme Court, however, held that it would violate the Tenth Amendment to require State and local law enforcement officials to carry out federal law.
Significance:
Printz v. United States stands for the proposition that Congress cannot commandeer a State’s executive branch for federal purposes. This case, however, had little practical value because most State and local officials voluntarily complied with the Brady Act’s background check provisions. Also, once the federal background check system was in place in 1998, a year after this decision was handed down, the issue became moot.
This is a variation/species of the "sovereign citizens movement" a anti-federalist libertarian-mindset. Some of them believe that there is no constitutional basis for any government above or beyond the county level.
I would imagine they travel in the same circles as the Bundys, the rancher family that organized two standoffs: one with the BLM in Nevada and one in Oregon at the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, where one person was eventually killed by the FBI. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupation_of_the_Malheur_National_Wildlife_Refuge
The National Sheriffs' Association was a leading advocate for adding animal cruelty as a data set in the Bureau's collection of crime statistics; the Association points out the overlap animal abuse has with domestic violence and child abuse; as of 2016 the FBI has added animal cruelty to its list of CLASS A FELONIES, alongside homicide and arson; psychological studies have shown that nearly 70% of violent criminals began by abusing animals. Just another extremely important initiative that we can thank the sheriffs for!
I have been trying to find out what sheriffs do and if it differs from county to county or state to state. This information is an eye opener and very much appreciated! Thank you!
Unfortunately, not everyone -- including voters in Ada County, Idaho -- is getting the message about Constitutional Sheriffs. They failed to elect Doug Traubel (endorsed by Sheriff Mack), who would have been a spectacular Constitutional Sheriff!
Trump appointed RFK Jr. to be the Head of HHS. It's on like Donkey Kong!
When the government fears the people, there is liberty” is a quote attributed to Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson believed that the government would only respect liberty if it feared losing power. He also said that the people can be trusted with their own government if they are well informed.
Thomas Jefferson's quote
Full quote
“When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. But when the government fears the people, there is liberty”
I am going to make one other observation here that is something to consider.
If this is something that people want, remember that this then alters the dynamic between the People, the States and the Fed. Gov. Not entirely for the better.
Additionally, it would mean that the powers and structure that have bled between these levels will once again be separated out. Not only in Law Enforcement but every other layer of government.
Again, with undesirable result yet to be seen.
Naomi has truly crossed over as a Patriot here, grasping she has the Right of self defense with a firearm = not controlled by unelected DC Globalist oriented Bureaucrats...!
Now with Dems inviting millions literally from multiple nations releasing their prisons and mental asylums ALL American women are potential victims of assualt, rape, robbery +/or murder...!
Sheriff Mack alluded to the "Clinton Chronicles" of the long list of 80 + - dead people that crossed the Clintons who were murdered mysteriously some in bizarre way's...!
Dr Wolf, 30 years behind the times, again? (Arguably 100 years. Have you read the drug crime cases from the early 20th century?)
Drug prohibition is unconstitutional (read Leary v US, 395 US 6 (1969)). Drug prohibition undergirds ALL thug-life policing. Sheriff Mack is NOT for drug legalization. Hence, he is FOR corruption, fraud, and enslavement. (Anyone read the 13th Amendment?)
Cops have DISCRETION to ignore acts - like voluntary transactions, but hey, why cut off the cops from their graft and military tactics?
Get serious about liberty, PLEASE!
Probably does not want to admit to her egregious leftist crimes like claiming Trump would incite insurrection on January 6th 2021.
Dear Mike, I am sorry, I cannot follow you. I noted that Sheriff Mack, like most POS cops, is all pro-drug war, asset forfeiture all the time. He is NOT pro-liberty. He is PRO-cop. What does that have to do with Dr. Wolf's nonsense about "insurrection"? Best
Got 4 and a half minutes? Watch Dr. Wolf construct the table and then set the table for leftist media narrative that President Trump will cause insurrection and declare martial law, and this based upon Democratic Governors ACTUALLY arrogating Emetgency Powers to themselves. She had a well-spoken and willing dimwit, Forlano, join her in this.
https://youtu.be/FslbjgJ4dog?si=NGXDnGyRioWW4lvd
There are sheriff's in Washington state that do not protect their people, protect and enforce election law, nor respond to calls of election malfeasance.
First I must congratulate everybody and America for the great election outcome, the result of much, much work of many, many and it was great to see it all being accomplished in the huge voting turnout. I would say, even Europe is feeling the vibe of hope by this, as America merits many thanks one more time!
Btw surely the good Sheriffs should get all the means they need...
Listening to the good Sheriffs comments about deputizing the church members and then it occurred to me that each state guard unit could also be deputized as protection against federal authority. That would make the full unit to include equipment available to be used as needed. I don’t believe it would ever be needed but the people would love to know that they do have power to protect themselves.
Dear Troy, try "protecting" yourself from Israeli-trained thugs, in military equipment, who decided that your house emits an odor .... Since the 1970s, the drug war + military training for cops have created a hyper police-state. END drug prohibition, END militarized cops. MAKE cops wear pink. The hostility will diminish!
I am hesitant to make too much of a discussion in this because of the complexities involved with constitutional law.
The last time I saw this kind of "Constitutional" verbose, we saw the Bundy Ranch situation and before that other more nefarious stories.
Some of them totally legitimate and some of them questionable. Including the possible if not probably troll.
J6 anyone?
I am not pointing fingers at any specific person making any specific or even spurious claim. Just the fact that alot of government level psyops have taken place in the past several decades, much of it originating in the late 1980's thru today. For this reason I am deeply cautious and filled with a healthy does of skepticism.
Federal unelected bureaucRats(CIA/FBLie/IRS/EPA/BLM/ATF/FDA/AG Dept/Dept of Ed. etc- have run rough shod over citizens since inception under the guise of "protecting the people"...!
Under FBLie Director Hoover wiretapped everyone illegally til they got in the way of his policy like in recent time = Lavoy Finicum, Ruby Ridge, Waco on + on
I didnt say unelected. You really need to learn civics. The Constitution provides for alot of heave and how in this.
its not what you may think.
I have been sending communications to the Trump team on many occasions trying to convince them that the only road back to constitutional life is through the county Sheriffs. I argued that the Sheriffs should be the only authority to arrest anyone in their county. All investigations by federal and state agencies would need to be registered with the Sheriff and monitored for constitutionality. The FBI needs to be dissolved at the leadership role and put under the National Sheriffs Association. Thus giving it more direct power over federal agencies. Raids like Mar-a-Lago would never have happened. If the IRS wants to hurt someone financially they would need to first register their investigation and then the Sherifs team would decide the penalties. They could even strike a deal where the subject could correct whatever the problem was. We only get this one time in history to protect ourselves from tyrants under Trump so lets not miss it.
Did the Zionists reply? Tell them the Dead Sea Scrolls sent ya ... haha
This is imporant and also valuable / helpful to put the name and the link to his case in this post.
Mack recommends:
Constitutional Sheriffs & Peace Officers Association
https://cspoa.org/the-victory-for-state-sovereignty/
The Victory for State Sovereignty
by: Richard Mack
Summary:
Printz vs United States, 521 U.S. 898 (1997)
https://legaldictionary.net/printz-v-united-states/
Following is the case brief:
The Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, a federal law, called for State and local law enforcement officials to conduct background checks people seeking to buy a gun.
Two law enforcement officials from Montana and Arizona challenged the law on constitutional grounds.
The Court of Appeals found the mandatory background check constitutional.
The U.S. Supreme Court, however, held that it would violate the Tenth Amendment to require State and local law enforcement officials to carry out federal law.
Significance:
Printz v. United States stands for the proposition that Congress cannot commandeer a State’s executive branch for federal purposes. This case, however, had little practical value because most State and local officials voluntarily complied with the Brady Act’s background check provisions. Also, once the federal background check system was in place in 1998, a year after this decision was handed down, the issue became moot.
full text of opinion
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/521/898/#tab-opinion-1960203
This is a variation/species of the "sovereign citizens movement" a anti-federalist libertarian-mindset. Some of them believe that there is no constitutional basis for any government above or beyond the county level.
I would imagine they travel in the same circles as the Bundys, the rancher family that organized two standoffs: one with the BLM in Nevada and one in Oregon at the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, where one person was eventually killed by the FBI. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupation_of_the_Malheur_National_Wildlife_Refuge
The National Sheriffs' Association was a leading advocate for adding animal cruelty as a data set in the Bureau's collection of crime statistics; the Association points out the overlap animal abuse has with domestic violence and child abuse; as of 2016 the FBI has added animal cruelty to its list of CLASS A FELONIES, alongside homicide and arson; psychological studies have shown that nearly 70% of violent criminals began by abusing animals. Just another extremely important initiative that we can thank the sheriffs for!
I have been trying to find out what sheriffs do and if it differs from county to county or state to state. This information is an eye opener and very much appreciated! Thank you!
Unfortunately, not everyone -- including voters in Ada County, Idaho -- is getting the message about Constitutional Sheriffs. They failed to elect Doug Traubel (endorsed by Sheriff Mack), who would have been a spectacular Constitutional Sheriff!
Links:
- Doug For Sheriff: https://dougforsheriff.com/
- Let's Have a Debate between Ada County Sheriff Candidates Clifford & Traubel: https://eolson47.substack.com/p/lets-have-a-debate-between-ada-county
- Ada County Results: https://www.livevoterturnout.com/ENR/idaho/133/2/en/Index_133.html
This is our only hope I'm afraid. Trump's playing 9-D chess now! https://timothywiney.substack.com/p/make-vaccines-great-again
9-D ... as in Israel First, all the time?