Looks like I'm doing comment #300, so that might make up for my being rather late here … ;-)
I perfectly understand your points about not falling for the globalists' authoritarian choreography and about being cautious because they might be coming for other groups a little later.
Only the thing is, they have come for "us" patriots for a lon…
Looks like I'm doing comment #300, so that might make up for my being rather late here … ;-)
I perfectly understand your points about not falling for the globalists' authoritarian choreography and about being cautious because they might be coming for other groups a little later.
Only the thing is, they have come for "us" patriots for a long time ALREADY.
Take the Jan6 hostages, for instance. And many more recent examples.
Or the fact that conservatives are practically prohibited from even speaking at prestigious colleges, and that has been done for many years now.
Maybe, just maybe it's time for the "other side", the crazy left, to take their own medicine.
The cancel culture and censorship is real and coming from the state authorities, too, in collusion with Big Tech. As you know all too well by personal experience, of course.
It's not a distant danger that we ought to prevent from materializing, it's all there already.
But it is asymmetrical. Conservatives and patriots are being silenced, while the crazy left can riot all day without any consequence. Or they even get rewarded by their cities for having been "traumatized" by law enforcement, or something.
How do we push back? How is it not justified to stop turning the other cheek, but give them a tiny portion of what they are imposing on us?
Besides, on a detail, I don't know exactly how "peaceful" it is, in fact, to practically demand genocide of Jews and annihilation of Israel. Yes, it's "only words", for the time being, but still.
Anyhow, why would a major law firm want to employ young people who have shown to be easily manipulated, or just plain deluded, lacking all sense of proportion and discernment?
If I knew an applicant had such a background, I sure wouldn't want them in my firm. That's not "cancel culture", necessarily.
Great comment, and after all that she's been through, I am amazed that Dr. Naomi is so tolerant of her/our enemies.
As someone who's been politically active in the NY suburbs for many decades, I don't have to tell you what it's like being a conservative/ MAGA/Republican these days or i the recent past.
We are now the Enemy in the ongoing war with Big Government. Be very careful what you say on social media or at town meetings. My own county has adopted a police state manifesto that allows people to report their neighbors to the local Sheriff if they think that person could potentially harm themselves or others. Wait till that one gets out, most people don't know about it. Thankfully.
No, I am not going to be inviting my enemies into my home any time soon. They already know way too much about me as it is.
I'm not blaming Dr. Wolf for being firm on the 1st, but the question is whether support of Hamas terror and ideology is still covered by it, because it's actually inciting violence, namely genocide. And it's spilling over into actual violent intimidation on campuses, too, as it seems.
Looks like I'm doing comment #300, so that might make up for my being rather late here … ;-)
I perfectly understand your points about not falling for the globalists' authoritarian choreography and about being cautious because they might be coming for other groups a little later.
Only the thing is, they have come for "us" patriots for a long time ALREADY.
Take the Jan6 hostages, for instance. And many more recent examples.
Or the fact that conservatives are practically prohibited from even speaking at prestigious colleges, and that has been done for many years now.
Maybe, just maybe it's time for the "other side", the crazy left, to take their own medicine.
The cancel culture and censorship is real and coming from the state authorities, too, in collusion with Big Tech. As you know all too well by personal experience, of course.
It's not a distant danger that we ought to prevent from materializing, it's all there already.
But it is asymmetrical. Conservatives and patriots are being silenced, while the crazy left can riot all day without any consequence. Or they even get rewarded by their cities for having been "traumatized" by law enforcement, or something.
How do we push back? How is it not justified to stop turning the other cheek, but give them a tiny portion of what they are imposing on us?
Besides, on a detail, I don't know exactly how "peaceful" it is, in fact, to practically demand genocide of Jews and annihilation of Israel. Yes, it's "only words", for the time being, but still.
Anyhow, why would a major law firm want to employ young people who have shown to be easily manipulated, or just plain deluded, lacking all sense of proportion and discernment?
If I knew an applicant had such a background, I sure wouldn't want them in my firm. That's not "cancel culture", necessarily.
Great comment, and after all that she's been through, I am amazed that Dr. Naomi is so tolerant of her/our enemies.
As someone who's been politically active in the NY suburbs for many decades, I don't have to tell you what it's like being a conservative/ MAGA/Republican these days or i the recent past.
We are now the Enemy in the ongoing war with Big Government. Be very careful what you say on social media or at town meetings. My own county has adopted a police state manifesto that allows people to report their neighbors to the local Sheriff if they think that person could potentially harm themselves or others. Wait till that one gets out, most people don't know about it. Thankfully.
No, I am not going to be inviting my enemies into my home any time soon. They already know way too much about me as it is.
I'm not blaming Dr. Wolf for being firm on the 1st, but the question is whether support of Hamas terror and ideology is still covered by it, because it's actually inciting violence, namely genocide. And it's spilling over into actual violent intimidation on campuses, too, as it seems.
‘From the river to the sea’ is an incitement of genocidal violence and is not covered by the 1st.