So where is that study saying people were saved by vaccine? There isn't one . Because they dont want one. You just got in line with the other sheep. You are the totally clueless one and a virtue signaler. Death of young people are up dramatically in every country that mandated.
As far as being at the bedside of someone dying unvaccinated,…
So where is that study saying people were saved by vaccine? There isn't one . Because they dont want one. You just got in line with the other sheep. You are the totally clueless one and a virtue signaler. Death of young people are up dramatically in every country that mandated.
As far as being at the bedside of someone dying unvaccinated, please, more of your virtue signaling as watching someone die regardless of cause is part of human condition for most of us. We are talking about an experimental gene therapy not the usual vector vaccines. So again stop virtue signaling about things you obviously know nothing about. Stopping those vaccines would not likely accelerate. Those diseases were eradicated more by modern sewer and water management and other improvements in hygiene than the immunizations. So again, stop with virtue signaling when you know nothing
There's a certain quality to your comment that reminds me of what a mentor of mine said, that a crucial step in education is getting people to understand that what their senses tell them is not reality; that in fact we are born blind (metaphorically speaking), and that the only way we have advanced beyond living like cavemen is by finding better ways to perceive reality, and to use that knowledge. Indeed, we have a lot of people walking around today who weren't taught this.
I had the thought that many people have thought their loved one(s) died from Covid, because that's what they were told. They have not looked at the possibility that they were mistreated, and perhaps killed by the people who treated them, because it didn't look like mistreatment. They were told, "The medical staff are so heroic." From what I've seen, it offends their conscience to think otherwise. It doesn't even enter their head, "Why would they do that?", assuming they did. We know some of that answer, but that's because we've taken time to learn what our government was doing with hospitals, and the dramatic contrast in results between doing what the hospitals did, and what people could do without them; what the success rate was, at least for this illness. The more we looked into that, the more we realized that what our institutions were telling us was a big lie. We looked to data, even if it was somewhat anecdotal, because it was coming from individual practices, but what we also looked for was consistency; whether different practitioners were getting similar results with similar treatments. In my mind, the internet has been wonderful for this. I'm going to sound like the other people, but I think the carnage would've been worse without it, because it would've been so hard for MDs who were trying things that worked to get the word out.
So where is that study saying people were saved by vaccine? There isn't one . Because they dont want one. You just got in line with the other sheep. You are the totally clueless one and a virtue signaler. Death of young people are up dramatically in every country that mandated.
As far as being at the bedside of someone dying unvaccinated, please, more of your virtue signaling as watching someone die regardless of cause is part of human condition for most of us. We are talking about an experimental gene therapy not the usual vector vaccines. So again stop virtue signaling about things you obviously know nothing about. Stopping those vaccines would not likely accelerate. Those diseases were eradicated more by modern sewer and water management and other improvements in hygiene than the immunizations. So again, stop with virtue signaling when you know nothing
There's a certain quality to your comment that reminds me of what a mentor of mine said, that a crucial step in education is getting people to understand that what their senses tell them is not reality; that in fact we are born blind (metaphorically speaking), and that the only way we have advanced beyond living like cavemen is by finding better ways to perceive reality, and to use that knowledge. Indeed, we have a lot of people walking around today who weren't taught this.
I had the thought that many people have thought their loved one(s) died from Covid, because that's what they were told. They have not looked at the possibility that they were mistreated, and perhaps killed by the people who treated them, because it didn't look like mistreatment. They were told, "The medical staff are so heroic." From what I've seen, it offends their conscience to think otherwise. It doesn't even enter their head, "Why would they do that?", assuming they did. We know some of that answer, but that's because we've taken time to learn what our government was doing with hospitals, and the dramatic contrast in results between doing what the hospitals did, and what people could do without them; what the success rate was, at least for this illness. The more we looked into that, the more we realized that what our institutions were telling us was a big lie. We looked to data, even if it was somewhat anecdotal, because it was coming from individual practices, but what we also looked for was consistency; whether different practitioners were getting similar results with similar treatments. In my mind, the internet has been wonderful for this. I'm going to sound like the other people, but I think the carnage would've been worse without it, because it would've been so hard for MDs who were trying things that worked to get the word out.